What are Naive Bayes Classifiers?
- Muiz As-Siddeeqi
- 18 hours ago
- 29 min read
The Algorithm That Filters Your Spam (and So Much More)
Every day, your email inbox stays clean because of a mathematical principle discovered over 260 years ago. While you sleep, intelligent systems analyze thousands of customer reviews to help businesses understand what you think. Doctors use probability models to predict diseases before symptoms become severe. Behind all of this work sits a surprisingly simple algorithm called the Naive Bayes classifier.
Named for an 18th-century minister who never published his famous theorem, this algorithm has become one of machine learning's most reliable workhorses. It protects billions of email accounts, powers recommendation engines, helps diagnose diseases, and drives business decisions worth millions of dollars. The beauty lies not in complexity but in elegant simplicity built on probability theory.
Don’t Just Read About AI — Own It. Right Here
TL;DR
Naïve Bayes classifiers use probability theory to predict which category (class) new data belongs to based on past patterns.
The algorithm assumes all features are independent—hence the name "naïve"—though this rarely holds true in real life.
Common applications include spam filtering (achieving 99%+ accuracy), sentiment analysis on customer reviews, medical diagnosis, and document classification.
Three main variants exist: Gaussian (continuous data), Multinomial (word counts), and Bernoulli (binary features).
Despite simple assumptions, Naïve Bayes often achieves 80-95% accuracy across diverse tasks and requires minimal training data.
The algorithm excels with high-dimensional data like text and scales efficiently to handle millions of documents.
What are Naive Bayes Classifiers?
Naïve Bayes classifiers are supervised machine learning algorithms that use Bayes' theorem to classify data by calculating probabilities. They assume all features are independent of each other and predict the class with the highest probability. Despite this "naïve" independence assumption, they perform remarkably well for text classification, spam detection, sentiment analysis, and medical diagnosis.
Table of Contents
Understanding the Foundation: What Makes It "Naïve"?
Naïve Bayes classifiers belong to a family of probabilistic machine learning algorithms used for classification tasks. At their core, they answer one fundamental question: given certain characteristics (features), what category (class) does this item most likely belong to?
The algorithm gets its name from two sources. "Bayes" refers to Bayes' theorem, a mathematical formula for calculating conditional probabilities discovered by Reverend Thomas Bayes and published posthumously in 1763 (Wikipedia, 2025). The "naïve" part comes from a bold assumption the algorithm makes: all features are independent of each other.
This independence assumption is almost never true in real-world data. In spam emails, for example, the word "free" and the word "prize" often appear together—they're not independent. In medical diagnosis, symptoms like fever and cough frequently occur together. Yet remarkably, Naïve Bayes classifiers work exceptionally well despite violating this core assumption.
According to research published in the International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, studies reveal that Naïve Bayes classifiers often achieve over 85% accuracy despite their independence assumption violations, indicating their robustness in real-world scenarios (IJAIR, 2023).
Think of it this way: imagine you're trying to determine if an email is spam. A Naïve Bayes classifier looks at individual words like "congratulations," "winner," and "click here," calculates the probability that spam emails contain each word, then combines these probabilities to make a final decision. It treats each word as if it appears completely randomly, ignoring that spam messages often use these words together in specific patterns.
The Mathematics Behind the Miracle
The power of Naïve Bayes lies in Bayes' theorem, which provides a principled way to reverse conditional probabilities. The fundamental equation is simple in concept but powerful in application.
Bayes' Theorem
For a classification problem, Bayes' theorem states:
P(Class | Features) = [P(Features | Class) × P(Class)] / P(Features)
Where:
P(Class | Features) is the probability that an item belongs to a certain class given its features (what we want to find)
P(Features | Class) is the probability of seeing those features in items of that class
P(Class) is the prior probability of that class occurring
P(Features) is the probability of seeing those features overall
The algorithm assumes conditional independence between features, which simplifies the calculation dramatically. Instead of computing complex joint probabilities, it multiplies individual feature probabilities together.
For multiple features (x₁, x₂, ..., xₙ), the formula becomes:
P(Class | x₁, x₂, ..., xₙ) = P(Class) × P(x₁|Class) × P(x₂|Class) × ... × P(xₙ|Class)
The classifier then selects the class with the highest posterior probability. This approach is computationally efficient because it only requires counting occurrences in the training data rather than complex iterative optimization (GeeksforGeeks, 2025).
Laplace Smoothing: Solving the Zero Probability Problem
A critical challenge arises when the classifier encounters a word it has never seen before in training data. Without adjustment, this would assign a zero probability and break the entire calculation. Laplace smoothing (also called additive smoothing) solves this by adding a small count (typically 1) to every feature count. This ensures no probability is ever exactly zero while minimally affecting well-represented features (Analytics Vidhya, 2025).
Three Flavors of Naïve Bayes
Naïve Bayes isn't a single algorithm but a family of related classifiers. Three main variants handle different types of data:
1. Gaussian Naïve Bayes
Used when features are continuous numbers that follow a normal (Gaussian) distribution. The algorithm calculates the mean and variance for each feature within each class, then uses the normal distribution formula to compute probabilities.
Best for: Measurements like height, temperature, blood pressure, or sensor readings.
Example: Predicting whether a patient has diabetes based on continuous measurements like glucose level, blood pressure, and BMI.
2. Multinomial Naïve Bayes
Designed for discrete count data, particularly word frequencies in text documents. It treats features as counts (how many times does each word appear?) and assumes a multinomial distribution.
Best for: Text classification tasks where word frequency matters.
Example: Classifying news articles into topics based on word counts. According to scikit-learn documentation, Multinomial Naïve Bayes achieves an F1-score of 0.88 on the 20 Newsgroups dataset (Scikit-learn, 2019).
3. Bernoulli Naïve Bayes
Works with binary features (present or absent). Instead of counting how many times a word appears, it only tracks whether the word appears at all.
Best for: Binary feature problems like whether specific words exist in a document.
Example: Spam filtering where you only care if certain trigger words appear, not how many times.
IBM notes that while Multinomial Naïve Bayes focuses on word frequency, Bernoulli Naïve Bayes deals with binary features where each feature indicates whether a word appears or not in a document, making it suited for scenarios where the presence or absence of terms is more relevant than their frequency (IBM, 2024).
Real-World Applications That Matter
Naïve Bayes classifiers power systems you interact with daily, often invisibly.
Email Spam Filtering
This is the classic application. Modern email services use Naïve Bayes (often combined with other techniques) to automatically separate spam from legitimate messages. The algorithm learns from millions of emails labeled as spam or not spam, identifying word patterns that distinguish junk mail from real correspondence.
Major email filters like SpamAssassin, SpamBayes, and Bogofilter all incorporate Bayesian spam filtering techniques (Wikipedia, 2025). Microsoft introduced Bayesian filtering to spam detection in 1998, marking a major shift from simple keyword-based rules to probabilistic machine learning approaches (Cornell Networks Blog, 2018).
Sentiment Analysis
Companies analyze customer reviews, social media posts, and feedback using Naïve Bayes to determine whether opinions are positive, negative, or neutral. This helps businesses understand customer satisfaction at scale.
A 2024 study published in Computers journal analyzed Amazon product reviews using multiple machine learning approaches and found that Naïve Bayes achieved 94% accuracy in classifying sentiments, though it was outperformed by Support Vector Machines at 100% accuracy (MDPI Computers, 2024).
Document Classification
News organizations, legal firms, and research institutions use Naïve Bayes to automatically categorize documents into topics. The 20 Newsgroups dataset—a standard benchmark containing approximately 20,000 newsgroup documents across 20 different categories—has been extensively tested with Naïve Bayes classifiers.
Research shows that Naïve Bayes achieves 81-83% accuracy on the 20 Newsgroups dataset without parameter tuning, with performance improving to 83-85% after optimization (Medium, 2018; ResearchGate, 2024).
Medical Diagnosis
Healthcare providers use Naïve Bayes models to assist in disease prediction and diagnosis. A systematic review published in PMC examined 23 studies using Naïve Bayesian networks for disease prediction between 2005 and 2015. The review found that 15 articles reported accuracy metrics, with 12 reporting sensitivity and specificity, and 11 reporting AUC scores (PMC, 2016).
Research on predicting heart disease, diabetes, and cancer using Naïve Bayes has shown promising results, with the algorithm providing fast, accurate predictions that assist physicians in clinical decision-making (Springer, 2020; JESIT, 2024).
Recommendation Systems
Streaming services and e-commerce platforms use Naïve Bayes as part of collaborative filtering systems to predict whether users will like certain products or content based on their past behavior and the behavior of similar users.
Case Study #1: How Paul Graham Revolutionized Spam Filtering
Background: By the early 2000s, email spam had become a massive problem. Traditional rule-based filters that looked for specific keywords were easily fooled by spammers who deliberately misspelled words like "V!agra" instead of "Viagra."
The Innovation: In 2002, programmer and entrepreneur Paul Graham published an influential essay titled "A Plan for Spam" that demonstrated how Bayesian techniques could achieve over 99% accuracy in spam detection with minimal false positives. His approach trained the filter on examples of both spam and legitimate emails (called "ham"), allowing it to learn patterns specific to each user's inbox (Grokipedia, 2025).
The Method: Graham's filter analyzed individual words and calculated their "spamicity"—the probability that a message containing that word is spam. Words like "free," "offer," and "unsubscribe" had high spamicity scores, while words like "professor" or "meeting" had low scores. The filter combined these individual probabilities using Bayes' theorem to calculate an overall spam probability for each message.
Results: Graham's implementation achieved remarkably low false positive rates (legitimate emails incorrectly marked as spam), making it practical for everyday use. This work inspired numerous commercial and open-source implementations, marking a shift from rule-based systems to probabilistic machine learning approaches in email filtering (Grokipedia, 2025).
Impact: Following Graham's work, Bayesian spam filtering became standard in email services. Early 2000s ISP implementations showed Naïve Bayes filters reducing visible spam in user inboxes by over 90%, as evidenced by production logs following Bayesian upgrades (Grokipedia, 2025).
Source: Paul Graham's essay "A Plan for Spam" (2002) and subsequent implementations documented in Wikipedia's article on Naïve Bayes spam filtering (Wikipedia, 2025).
Case Study #2: Amazon's Sentiment Analysis at Scale
Background: E-commerce platforms receive millions of product reviews annually. Manually analyzing customer sentiment at this scale is impossible, yet understanding customer opinions drives crucial business decisions about product quality, marketing strategies, and inventory management.
The Challenge: Amazon needed to automatically classify product reviews as positive, negative, or neutral to track customer satisfaction trends, identify problematic products, and highlight customer concerns.
Implementation: Researchers have extensively studied sentiment analysis on Amazon product reviews using Naïve Bayes classifiers. A 2024 study collected 32,054 Amazon reviews across multiple product categories, with reviews dating from May 2015 to February 2024. The dataset showed an imbalanced distribution favoring positive reviews, with over 10,000 5-star reviews compared to around 3,500 1-star reviews (MDPI Computers, 2024).
Multiple research teams have applied different Naïve Bayes variants to Amazon review classification:
A 2023 study comparing algorithms found Multinomial Naïve Bayes achieved strong performance on Amazon reviews for products including the Apple iPhone 5S, Samsung J7, and Redmi Note 3, outperforming Logistic Regression in categorizing reviews as positive or negative (MDPI Electronics, 2024).
Research presented at ICCMC 2023 analyzed Amazon product reviews using both LSTM and Naïve Bayes, demonstrating the algorithm's continued relevance alongside modern deep learning approaches (Springer, 2024).
Results: Studies have shown that Naïve Bayes achieves accuracy rates of 80-94% on Amazon sentiment analysis tasks, depending on preprocessing techniques, feature selection methods, and the specific product categories analyzed (Springer, 2023; MDPI Electronics, 2024).
Key Advantage: Naïve Bayes provided fast training and prediction times compared to more complex algorithms. For businesses needing real-time sentiment monitoring across thousands of products, this computational efficiency proved critical.
Business Impact: Automated sentiment analysis enables Amazon and other e-commerce platforms to identify trending products, detect quality issues early, and understand customer preferences at scale—insights that would be impossible to extract manually.
Sources: Research published in Computers (MDPI, December 2024), Electronics (MDPI, March 2024), and multiple Springer conference proceedings (2023-2024).
Case Study #3: Medical Diagnosis and Disease Prediction
Background: Early disease detection saves lives, but diagnostic accuracy depends heavily on physician experience and available data. Machine learning models can assist doctors by identifying patterns in patient data that suggest specific diseases.
The Application: Researchers have applied Naïve Bayes classifiers to predict various diseases including heart disease, diabetes, cancer, kidney disease, and neurological disorders.
Specific Implementation - Coronary Angiography Prediction:
A cross-sectional study conducted at Ghaem Hospital in Mashhad, Iran (2011-2012) examined 1,187 candidates for coronary angiography. Researchers compared three algorithms—Logistic Regression, Naïve Bayes, and Support Vector Machine—to predict angiography results (PMC, 2020).
Dataset: The study analyzed patient data including age, gender, family history, blood pressure, fasting blood glucose (FBG), triglycerides (TG), and history of myocardial infarction or heart disease.
Results:
Naïve Bayes achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.74 using only three variables: gender, age, and FBG.
Support Vector Machine achieved AUC of 0.75 using six variables.
Logistic Regression achieved AUC of 0.76 using seven variables.
Key Finding: Despite using fewer variables (three versus six or seven), the Naïve Bayes model performed comparably to more complex models. This parsimony makes it particularly valuable in clinical settings where simpler models are easier to interpret and implement (PMC, 2020).
Broader Medical Applications:
A systematic review of Naïve Bayesian networks in disease prediction (2005-2015) found:
15 out of 23 reviewed studies reported accuracy metrics.
5 studies specifically used Naïve Bayes for predicting brain diseases.
The mean number of features used was approximately 17 variables.
Applications spanned cardiovascular disease, diabetes, cancer, and neurological disorders (PMC, 2016).
COVID-19 Application:
During the pandemic, researchers developed Naïve Bayes models for COVID-19 health-status prediction. A 2024 study leveraged drugs and diagnoses data to predict COVID-19 patient outcomes, demonstrating the algorithm's adaptability to emerging health crises (Springer Bioinformatics, 2024).
Clinical Advantage: Naïve Bayes models train quickly, require relatively little data compared to deep learning approaches, and provide probabilistic outputs that physicians can interpret. These characteristics make them practical for clinical decision support systems.
Sources: PMC systematic review (2016), comparison study of SVM, Naïve Bayes, and Logistic Regression (PMC, 2020), and Springer Bioinformatics COVID-19 study (2024).
How Naïve Bayes Stacks Up Against Other Algorithms
Understanding when to use Naïve Bayes requires comparing it to alternative machine learning algorithms.
Naïve Bayes vs. Support Vector Machines (SVM)
SVM Advantages:
Better at capturing complex, non-linear relationships between features.
Generally achieves higher accuracy on large, complex datasets.
Performs well when the number of features exceeds the number of samples.
Naïve Bayes Advantages:
Much faster to train—often 10-100x faster than SVM.
Requires less training data to achieve reasonable performance.
Works better with small datasets. Research by Andrew Ng showed that when you have very little training data, generative models like Naïve Bayes can beat discriminative models like SVM (Cross Validated, 2019).
More interpretable—you can see which features drive predictions.
Performance Examples:
On fake news detection, SVM achieved 100% accuracy while Naïve Bayes achieved 94%, demonstrating SVM's superiority on complex classification tasks (Everant Technology Journal, 2024).
However, Naïve Bayes trained and predicted much faster, making it suitable for real-time applications.
On text snippets (short documents), Multinomial Naïve Bayes often outperforms SVM (Stack Overflow, 2019).
Naïve Bayes vs. Logistic Regression
Logistic Regression Advantages:
Better at capturing correlations between features.
More flexible—can model complex decision boundaries.
Provides clearer coefficient interpretations for each feature.
Naïve Bayes Advantages:
Faster training time.
Better performance with limited training data.
Naturally handles multi-class classification without modification.
More robust to irrelevant features.
Performance Examples:
On the Iris dataset (a classic machine learning benchmark), both algorithms achieved perfect 1.00 accuracy, showing they perform equally well on simple, well-separated data (Medium, 2024; GeeksforGeeks, 2025).
On Amazon sentiment analysis, a 2023 study found Logistic Regression achieved 87.3% accuracy while Multinomial Naïve Bayes scored slightly lower, but Naïve Bayes trained significantly faster (Springer, 2023).
Naïve Bayes vs. Random Forest
Random Forest Advantages:
Handles both numerical and categorical data without assumptions.
Captures complex feature interactions automatically.
Generally more accurate on structured data.
Naïve Bayes Advantages:
Much faster training and prediction.
Requires less memory.
Works better with high-dimensional text data.
More interpretable predictions.
Performance Examples:
On disease prediction datasets (diabetes, heart disease, cancer), Random Forest typically achieved 2-5% higher accuracy than Naïve Bayes (Springer, 2020).
However, Naïve Bayes trained 5-10x faster, making it practical for real-time medical screening applications.
General Performance Benchmarks
Research across multiple domains shows:
Text Classification: Naïve Bayes achieves 80-95% accuracy on most text classification tasks (document categorization, spam filtering, sentiment analysis).
Medical Diagnosis: Accuracy ranges from 70-90% depending on the disease and available features (PMC, 2016).
Spam Filtering: Modern implementations exceed 99% accuracy with proper training (Grokipedia, 2025).
20 Newsgroups Dataset: 81-85% accuracy, competitive with more complex algorithms (Medium, 2018; ResearchGate, 2024).
Strengths and Limitations
Strengths
1. Simplicity and Speed Naïve Bayes is remarkably fast to train. Because it only requires counting occurrences and calculating probabilities, it can process millions of documents in seconds. IBM notes that compared to logistic regression, Naïve Bayes is considered a fast and efficient classifier that is fairly accurate when the conditional independence assumption holds (IBM, 2024).
2. Works with Small Datasets Unlike deep learning models that require thousands or millions of examples, Naïve Bayes can produce reasonable predictions with just dozens or hundreds of training examples. This makes it ideal for problems where labeled data is scarce.
3. Handles High-Dimensional Data Text classification problems often involve thousands of unique words (features). Naïve Bayes scales linearly with the number of features and doesn't suffer from the curse of dimensionality as severely as other algorithms (Scikit-learn, 2024).
4. Provides Probabilistic Predictions Instead of just predicting a class, Naïve Bayes outputs probabilities for each class. This allows you to assess confidence and set custom decision thresholds.
5. Easy to Update Adding new training examples requires only updating the relevant probability counts, making the model easy to maintain and adapt as new data arrives.
6. Naturally Handles Multi-Class Problems While algorithms like logistic regression require modification to handle more than two classes, Naïve Bayes naturally works with any number of classes.
Limitations
1. The Independence Assumption The biggest limitation is the assumption that all features are independent. In reality, features often correlate. Words in spam emails cluster together ("free" and "prize" frequently co-occur). Medical symptoms relate to each other (fever and cough often appear together).
This assumption can lead to overconfident predictions. Wikipedia notes that Naïve Bayes models often produce wildly overconfident probabilities, though this doesn't always hurt classification accuracy (Wikipedia, 2025).
2. Zero Frequency Problem If a word appears in the test data but never appeared in the training data for a particular class, the algorithm assigns zero probability to that class. Laplace smoothing mitigates this issue but doesn't eliminate it completely.
3. Limited by Available Training Data The model can only learn patterns present in the training data. If the training set doesn't represent the full range of possible inputs, predictions will be unreliable.
4. Assumes Feature Distributions Different Naïve Bayes variants assume different probability distributions (Gaussian, Multinomial, Bernoulli). If these assumptions don't match your data, performance suffers.
5. Vulnerable to Irrelevant Features While Naïve Bayes handles high-dimensional data well, truly irrelevant features that have no relationship to the target class can hurt performance by adding noise to probability calculations.
6. Not Always the Most Accurate On complex classification problems with intricate feature relationships, more sophisticated algorithms (Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, Neural Networks) typically achieve higher accuracy. The trade-off is simplicity and speed versus maximum performance.
When to Use Naïve Bayes
Use Naïve Bayes when:
You have text classification problems (spam filtering, sentiment analysis, document categorization).
You need fast training and prediction times.
You have limited training data.
You have extremely high-dimensional data.
You need a simple, interpretable baseline model.
You need probabilistic predictions, not just class labels.
Consider alternatives when:
Feature relationships are complex and critical to accurate classification.
You have abundant training data and computational resources.
You need the absolute highest accuracy possible.
Features are strongly correlated in ways that violate independence assumptions.
Industry Adoption and Market Trends
The broader machine learning market provides context for Naïve Bayes adoption across industries.
Overall Machine Learning Market Growth
The global machine learning market is experiencing explosive growth:
2024 Market Size: Valued between $53-79 billion depending on the source (SkyQuest, 2024; AIPRM, 2024).
2030 Projection: Expected to reach $394-503 billion (AIPRM, 2024; Statista, 2024).
Growth Rate: Compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 30-46% between 2024 and 2030 (Grand View Research, 2024; Maximize Market Research, 2024).
According to AIPRM's 2024 machine learning statistics, after doubling in value (+165%) between 2020 and 2021, the market fell by nearly half in 2022 (-47%), dropping by a further fifth (21%) in 2023, before recovering with 38% growth in 2024 (AIPRM, 2024).
Industry-Specific Adoption
Manufacturing: Holds the largest market share at 18.88%, using machine learning for predictive maintenance, quality control, and supply chain optimization (DemandSage, 2025).
Finance: The second-largest sector at 15.42%, employing machine learning for fraud detection, risk assessment, and algorithmic trading. Banks are projected to spend $20.64 billion on AI-centric systems (AI Statistics, 2025).
Healthcare: Rapidly adopting machine learning for diagnosis, drug discovery, and personalized medicine. ML can help achieve up to 95% accuracy in predicting COVID-19-related physiological deterioration (DemandSage, 2025).
Retail and E-Commerce: Using machine learning extensively for recommendation systems, inventory management, and customer sentiment analysis. The retail industry invested $19.71 billion in AI-centric systems in 2023 (AI Statistics, 2025).
Corporate Adoption Rates
92% of leading businesses stated they have invested in machine learning and AI (DemandSage, 2025).
34% of US companies have adopted machine learning, while 42% are exploring it (DemandSage, 2025).
80% of companies report that investing in machine learning increased their revenue (DemandSage, 2025).
57% of companies use machine learning to improve consumer experience (DemandSage, 2025).
Regional Distribution
North America: Leads in machine learning adoption with 80% adoption rate, followed by Asia (37%) and Europe (29%). The US machine learning market is projected to reach $21.14 billion in 2024 (G2 Learn, 2024; DemandSage, 2025).
Asia Pacific: Expected to witness the biggest change from utilizing AI and ML technologies, with countries like China and India ahead in machine learning applications—60% of IT specialists in these countries use such technologies (DemandSage, 2025; Sci-Tech Today, 2025).
Naïve Bayes Specific Adoption
While comprehensive statistics specifically tracking Naïve Bayes usage are limited (most market reports cover machine learning broadly), the algorithm remains widely deployed:
Email Services: All major email providers (Gmail, Outlook, Yahoo) incorporate Bayesian spam filtering, collectively protecting billions of inboxes daily.
Customer Service: A survey found 87% of current AI adopters were using or considering using AI to forecast and improve email marketing, often incorporating Naïve Bayes for classification tasks (G2 Learn, 2024).
Text Analytics: The natural language processing industry is estimated at $43 billion worldwide, with Naïve Bayes serving as a foundational algorithm for many text classification applications (Sci-Tech Today, 2025).
Investment and Research Trends
Machine learning platforms have raised $3.1 billion in investments from more than 4,400 companies (G2 Learn, 2024).
20% of C-level executives across ten countries and 14 different industries report using machine learning as a core part of their business (G2 Learn, 2024).
Investment in AI will increase by more than 300% in the coming years (G2 Learn, 2024).
Common Myths vs. Facts
Myth #1: "The Independence Assumption Makes Naïve Bayes Worthless"
Fact: While the independence assumption is indeed "naïve" and rarely holds in real data, Naïve Bayes still performs remarkably well in practice. Studies show it often achieves over 85% accuracy despite clear violations of the independence assumption (IJAIR, 2023). The algorithm is robust to this assumption violation because the relative ordering of probabilities often matters more than their absolute values for classification.
Myth #2: "Naïve Bayes Is Outdated—Deep Learning Is Always Better"
Fact: For specific tasks, especially those involving limited data or high-dimensional text, Naïve Bayes often outperforms complex models. Research comparing Naïve Bayes to LSTM (a deep learning architecture) on the 20 Newsgroups dataset showed that while LSTM achieved 81.70% accuracy, Naïve Bayes came very close with simpler implementation and much faster training (ResearchGate, 2024). When you have fewer than 1,000 training examples, Naïve Bayes frequently beats more complex algorithms.
Myth #3: "Naïve Bayes Only Works for Text Classification"
Fact: While text classification is a strength, Naïve Bayes successfully handles many other domains. Medical diagnosis studies have demonstrated strong performance predicting heart disease, diabetes, cancer, and other conditions (PMC, 2016; Springer, 2020). It's also used for recommendation systems, real-time prediction, and multi-class prediction across various industries.
Myth #4: "You Need Huge Amounts of Data to Train Naïve Bayes"
Fact: This is backwards. Naïve Bayes actually requires less training data than most other algorithms. Because it makes the independence assumption, it needs fewer examples to estimate parameters reliably. Research has shown that Naïve Bayes performs better than logistic regression and SVM when training data is scarce (Cross Validated, 2019).
Myth #5: "All Naïve Bayes Classifiers Are the Same"
Fact: There are three main variants—Gaussian, Multinomial, and Bernoulli—each suited to different data types. Using the wrong variant for your data significantly hurts performance. Gaussian Naïve Bayes assumes continuous features follow normal distributions, Multinomial works with count data (word frequencies), and Bernoulli handles binary features.
Myth #6: "Naïve Bayes Can't Handle Real-Time Applications"
Fact: Naïve Bayes is actually one of the best algorithms for real-time applications precisely because of its computational efficiency. It can classify thousands of documents per second, making it ideal for spam filtering, real-time sentiment monitoring, and live content moderation.
Myth #7: "The Probabilities Naïve Bayes Outputs Are Accurate"
Fact: While Naïve Bayes produces probabilistic outputs, these probabilities are often poorly calibrated due to the independence assumption. Wikipedia notes that Naïve Bayes models often produce wildly overconfident probabilities (Wikipedia, 2025). However, the relative ordering of probabilities is usually correct, which is what matters for classification. If you need calibrated probability estimates, additional techniques like Platt scaling should be applied.
Implementation Best Practices
Data Preprocessing
1. Handle Missing Values Naïve Bayes doesn't naturally handle missing data. Either remove samples with missing values or use imputation techniques to fill them in before training.
2. Text Preprocessing for NLP Tasks
Tokenization: Split text into individual words or tokens.
Lowercasing: Convert all text to lowercase to treat "Free" and "free" identically.
Stop Word Removal: Remove common words like "the," "a," "is" that provide little discriminatory value—but keep potentially informative words like "free" that might be in standard stop word lists.
Stemming or Lemmatization: Reduce words to their root forms (optional, test whether it improves performance).
3. Handle Imbalanced Classes If one class dominates your training data (e.g., 95% non-spam, 5% spam), consider:
Collecting more examples of the minority class.
Using sampling techniques like SMOTE to balance classes.
Adjusting decision thresholds based on class probabilities.
Feature Engineering
1. Choose the Right Variant
Continuous numerical features: Use Gaussian Naïve Bayes.
Word count features (term frequency): Use Multinomial Naïve Bayes.
Binary features (word present/absent): Use Bernoulli Naïve Bayes.
2. Feature Selection While Naïve Bayes handles high-dimensional data well, removing truly irrelevant features can improve performance. Techniques include:
Chi-squared test for categorical features.
Mutual information for general feature relevance.
Domain knowledge to eliminate clearly irrelevant features.
3. Apply Smoothing Always use Laplace smoothing (add-one smoothing) or similar techniques to avoid zero probabilities. The scikit-learn library's default alpha=1.0 parameter applies Laplace smoothing automatically (Scikit-learn, 2024).
Training and Evaluation
1. Split Data Properly Use proper train/test splits or cross-validation to evaluate performance. Common splits are 70-30 or 80-20 (training-testing).
2. Use Appropriate Metrics
Accuracy: Good for balanced datasets.
Precision and Recall: Better for imbalanced classes (e.g., spam detection where false positives are costly).
F1-Score: Harmonic mean of precision and recall, useful for imbalanced problems.
AUC-ROC: Evaluates performance across different classification thresholds.
3. Cross-Validation Use k-fold cross-validation (typically k=5 or k=10) to get more robust performance estimates, especially with smaller datasets.
Deployment Considerations
1. Model Updates Naïve Bayes makes incremental updates easy. In production spam filters, you can continuously update probability counts as users mark emails as spam or not spam.
2. Monitor Performance Track key metrics over time. If accuracy drops, it may indicate that your data distribution has shifted (concept drift) and retraining is needed.
3. Explainability One advantage of Naïve Bayes is interpretability. You can show users which words or features contributed most to a classification decision, helping build trust in automated systems.
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
1. Forgetting to Apply Smoothing Encountering new words in test data will break your model without smoothing.
2. Using Gaussian Naïve Bayes on Text Data Word counts don't follow normal distributions. Use Multinomial or Bernoulli variants for text.
3. Ignoring Class Imbalance If 99% of your training data is one class, your model will just predict that class for everything.
4. Over-Engineering Features Naïve Bayes works well with simple features. Complex feature engineering often helps less than with other algorithms.
5. Not Validating Assumptions Check whether your continuous features roughly follow normal distributions (for Gaussian Naïve Bayes). If they don't, consider transforming them or using a different algorithm.
The Future of Naïve Bayes
Despite being based on 18th-century mathematics, Naïve Bayes continues to evolve and find new applications.
Hybrid Approaches
Modern implementations increasingly combine Naïve Bayes with other techniques:
NBSVM (Naïve Bayes - Support Vector Machine): Researchers have developed hybrid models that use Naïve Bayes to transform features, then apply SVM for final classification. This approach takes the best of both worlds—fast feature learning from Naïve Bayes with powerful classification from SVM (Stack Overflow, 2019).
Ensemble Methods: Combining Naïve Bayes with other classifiers in ensemble models can improve overall accuracy. Studies on disease prediction used Naïve Bayes as a meta-learner in stacking ensembles, achieving higher accuracy than individual classifiers (PMC, 2022).
Advances in Smoothing Techniques
Research continues to develop better smoothing methods to address the zero-frequency problem. Log-bilinear models and semantic smoothing based on word embeddings show promise for improving Naïve Bayes performance on text classification when training data is limited (ResearchGate, 2014).
Real-Time and Streaming Applications
As data volumes grow, the ability to update models incrementally becomes more valuable. Naïve Bayes naturally supports incremental learning, making it well-suited for streaming data applications:
Real-time content moderation on social media platforms.
Continuous spam filtering that adapts to new spam tactics.
Live sentiment monitoring for brand reputation management.
Scikit-learn's implementation includes a partial_fit method specifically for incremental learning on streaming data (Scikit-learn, 2024).
Edge Computing and IoT
The computational efficiency of Naïve Bayes makes it attractive for edge computing applications where processing happens on resource-constrained devices:
Mobile spam filtering running on smartphones.
IoT sensor classification on embedded devices.
Local content recommendation without cloud processing.
Integration with Modern NLP
While transformer models like BERT dominate modern NLP, Naïve Bayes still serves as:
A fast baseline for benchmarking more complex models.
A fallback method when transformer inference is too slow or resource-intensive.
A component in hybrid systems that combine rule-based, statistical, and neural approaches.
Automated Machine Learning (AutoML)
AutoML platforms routinely include Naïve Bayes in their algorithm selection processes, automatically choosing it when data characteristics (high dimensionality, limited samples, need for speed) favor its strengths.
Continued Research
Academic research continues to refine Naïve Bayes:
Higher-order Naïve Bayes models that capture some feature dependencies while maintaining computational efficiency (ResearchGate, 2014).
Complement Naïve Bayes that specifically addresses imbalanced datasets by computing weights from the complement of each class (Scikit-learn, 2024).
Bayesian network extensions that relax independence assumptions in principled ways.
Enduring Relevance
The machine learning market's explosive growth—projected to reach $503 billion by 2030 (AIPRM, 2024)—will create demand for diverse algorithm portfolios. Naïve Bayes will remain relevant because:
Simplicity matters: As machine learning democratizes, simple, interpretable algorithms become more valuable.
Speed matters: Real-time applications continue to grow, favoring fast algorithms.
Data scarcity persists: Many problems still lack abundant labeled data.
Baseline benchmarking: Practitioners will always need simple baselines to validate that complex models actually improve performance.
The algorithm that Thomas Bayes inspired in 1763, simplified by modern machine learning practitioners with the "naïve" independence assumption, will likely continue powering practical applications for decades to come.
FAQ
1. What does "naïve" mean in Naïve Bayes?
"Naïve" refers to the algorithm's assumption that all features are conditionally independent given the class label. This assumption is "naïve" because in real-world data, features usually correlate with each other. For example, in spam emails, words like "free" and "prize" often appear together. Despite this unrealistic assumption, the algorithm works surprisingly well in practice.
2. How does Naïve Bayes handle continuous features?
Gaussian Naïve Bayes specifically handles continuous features by assuming they follow a normal (Gaussian) distribution within each class. It calculates the mean and standard deviation for each feature in each class, then uses the normal distribution probability density function to compute likelihoods. This works well for measurements like temperature, blood pressure, or sensor readings.
3. Why is Naïve Bayes so fast compared to other algorithms?
Naïve Bayes only requires counting occurrences and calculating simple probabilities—no complex optimization or iterative parameter tuning. Training involves scanning through the data once to compute counts, making it orders of magnitude faster than algorithms like SVM or neural networks that require iterative optimization.
4. Can Naïve Bayes handle more than two classes?
Yes, Naïve Bayes naturally handles multi-class problems. It calculates probabilities for each class and selects the one with the highest probability. Unlike logistic regression which requires modification for multi-class problems (one-vs-rest), Naïve Bayes works with any number of classes without modification.
5. What is the zero frequency problem and how is it solved?
The zero frequency problem occurs when a feature value appears in test data but never appeared in training data for a particular class. This would assign zero probability to that class, breaking the calculation. Laplace smoothing (add-one smoothing) solves this by adding a small count (typically 1) to all feature counts, ensuring no probability is ever exactly zero.
6. When should I use Multinomial vs. Bernoulli Naïve Bayes for text?
Use Multinomial when word frequency matters (how many times each word appears). This works well for longer documents where repeated words provide useful information.
Use Bernoulli when you only care about word presence/absence, not frequency. This often works better for short texts like tweets or subject lines where word repetition is rare.
7. How much training data does Naïve Bayes need?
Naïve Bayes works with remarkably little data—often producing reasonable results with just dozens or hundreds of training examples. Research shows it outperforms more complex algorithms like logistic regression and SVM when training data is scarce. However, like all algorithms, more data generally improves performance up to a point.
8. Can Naïve Bayes output probability estimates?
Yes, Naïve Bayes naturally outputs probabilities for each class. However, these probabilities are often poorly calibrated (overconfident) due to the independence assumption. If you need accurate probability estimates rather than just classifications, consider applying calibration techniques like Platt scaling or isotonic regression.
9. What are the main alternatives to Naïve Bayes for text classification?
Main alternatives include:
Logistic Regression: Better at capturing feature correlations, but slower to train.
Support Vector Machines (SVM): Often higher accuracy on complex problems, but much slower and requires more data.
Random Forest: Handles feature interactions automatically but slower and less interpretable.
Neural Networks/Transformers (BERT, etc.): Highest accuracy on many NLP tasks but requires substantial data and computational resources.
10. Is Naïve Bayes still relevant in the age of deep learning?
Absolutely. Naïve Bayes remains relevant for:
Small data scenarios where deep learning fails.
Real-time applications requiring millisecond predictions.
Resource-constrained environments (mobile devices, IoT).
Baseline benchmarking to validate that complex models actually improve performance.
Interpretable systems where understanding predictions matters.
Major email services still use Bayesian spam filters protecting billions of inboxes daily.
11. How do I handle imbalanced datasets with Naïve Bayes?
Techniques include:
Adjusting class priors: Manually set class probabilities to reflect true population distributions rather than training set distributions.
Resampling: Oversample the minority class or undersample the majority class.
SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique creates synthetic examples of the minority class.
Threshold adjustment: Set custom decision thresholds based on the cost of different error types.
12. Can Naïve Bayes be used for regression?
No, Naïve Bayes is fundamentally a classification algorithm designed to predict discrete class labels, not continuous numerical values. For regression tasks (predicting numbers), use algorithms like linear regression, decision trees, random forests, or neural networks.
Key Takeaways
Naïve Bayes classifiers are probabilistic machine learning algorithms based on Bayes' theorem that assume all features are independent—a "naïve" assumption that rarely holds true but doesn't prevent strong performance.
Three main variants exist for different data types: Gaussian (continuous features following normal distributions), Multinomial (count data like word frequencies), and Bernoulli (binary features).
Real-world applications span diverse industries: spam filtering achieves 99%+ accuracy, sentiment analysis on customer reviews reaches 80-94% accuracy, medical diagnosis assists with disease prediction, and document classification handles millions of articles.
Performance benchmarks show competitive accuracy: 81-85% on the 20 Newsgroups dataset, 70-90% on medical diagnosis tasks, and 80-95% on most text classification problems—often matching more complex algorithms.
Key advantages include exceptional training speed (10-100x faster than SVM), ability to work with limited training data, natural handling of high-dimensional data, and easy incremental updates for streaming applications.
Primary limitations stem from the independence assumption leading to overconfident probabilities, the zero-frequency problem requiring smoothing techniques, and generally lower accuracy than complex models on tasks with intricate feature relationships.
Optimal use cases involve text classification, real-time prediction, resource-constrained environments, small datasets, and situations requiring fast training or interpretable models.
The global machine learning market is projected to grow from $53-79 billion in 2024 to $394-503 billion by 2030, with 92% of leading businesses investing in ML and 80% reporting revenue increases.
Industry adoption is highest in manufacturing (18.88% market share), finance (15.42%), and healthcare, with 34% of US companies already using ML and 42% exploring it.
Future developments include hybrid approaches combining Naïve Bayes with other algorithms (NBSVM), integration with modern NLP systems, deployment on edge devices and IoT sensors, and continued research on smoothing techniques and relaxing independence assumptions.
Actionable Next Steps
Start with a simple implementation: Use Python's scikit-learn library to build your first Naïve Bayes classifier on a text classification problem. The library provides simple APIs for Gaussian, Multinomial, and Bernoulli variants.
Choose the right variant for your data: Identify whether you're working with continuous numerical features (Gaussian), word counts (Multinomial), or binary features (Bernoulli), and select accordingly.
Apply proper preprocessing: For text data, implement tokenization, lowercasing, and stop word removal. For numerical data, check whether features follow normal distributions before applying Gaussian Naïve Bayes.
Always use smoothing: Enable Laplace smoothing (scikit-learn's default alpha=1.0) to prevent zero-frequency problems when new feature values appear in test data.
Benchmark against alternatives: After building a Naïve Bayes baseline, compare its performance to logistic regression, SVM, or random forests on your specific problem to determine whether the simplicity-speed trade-off is worthwhile.
Measure the right metrics: Use accuracy for balanced datasets, but switch to precision, recall, and F1-score for imbalanced problems like spam detection where false positive costs differ from false negative costs.
Consider hybrid approaches: If Naïve Bayes alone doesn't achieve target performance, explore NBSVM or ensemble methods that combine its speed with the accuracy of other algorithms.
Monitor and update: In production systems, implement monitoring for performance degradation and establish processes for incremental model updates as new labeled data arrives.
Explore advanced variants: Research Complement Naïve Bayes for imbalanced datasets, Higher-Order Naïve Bayes for capturing some feature dependencies, or semantic smoothing for improved text classification.
Read the canonical resources: Study Paul Graham's original 2002 essay "A Plan for Spam," explore scikit-learn's documentation, and review academic papers on Naïve Bayes applications in your specific domain.
Glossary
Bayes' Theorem: A mathematical formula for calculating conditional probabilities, discovered by Thomas Bayes and published posthumously in 1763. It describes how to update the probability of a hypothesis based on new evidence.
Bernoulli Naïve Bayes: A variant of Naïve Bayes designed for binary features (present/absent). Used when you only care whether a feature appears, not how many times.
Class: The category or label you're trying to predict. In spam filtering, classes are "spam" and "ham" (not spam). In sentiment analysis, classes might be "positive," "negative," and "neutral."
Conditional Independence: The assumption that the probability of one feature doesn't depend on the values of other features, given the class label. This is the "naïve" assumption in Naïve Bayes.
Feature: An individual measurable property or characteristic used as input to the algorithm. In email classification, features might be individual words. In medical diagnosis, features could be symptoms or test results.
Gaussian Naïve Bayes: A variant that assumes continuous features follow a normal (Gaussian/bell-curve) distribution within each class. Used for numerical measurements like temperature, blood pressure, or sensor readings.
Laplace Smoothing (Add-One Smoothing): A technique that adds a small count (typically 1) to all feature counts to prevent zero probabilities when features appear in test data but not in training data for a particular class.
Likelihood: The probability of observing the given features if the item belongs to a specific class: P(Features | Class).
Multinomial Naïve Bayes: A variant designed for discrete count data, especially word frequencies in text. It treats features as counts of how many times each word appears.
Posterior Probability: The probability that an item belongs to a class given its observed features: P(Class | Features). This is what Naïve Bayes calculates.
Prior Probability: The probability of a class occurring before considering any features: P(Class). Usually estimated from the frequency of each class in training data.
Supervised Learning: Machine learning where the algorithm learns from labeled examples (data where the correct answer is known). Naïve Bayes is a supervised learning algorithm.
Training Data: Labeled examples used to train the model. The algorithm learns feature probabilities from this data.
Zero Frequency Problem: When a feature value appears in test data but never appeared in training data for a particular class, causing zero probability and breaking calculations. Solved by smoothing techniques.
Sources & References
Academic & Research Papers:
Langarizadeh, M., & Moghbeli, F. (2016). Applying Naive Bayesian Networks to Disease Prediction: a Systematic Review. Acta Informatica Medica, 24(5), 364-369. PMC. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5203736/
Naji, M.A., et al. (2024). A comprehensive review for chronic disease prediction using machine learning algorithms. Journal of Electrical Systems and Information Technology, 11(27). https://jesit.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s43067-024-00150-4
Ray, A., et al. (2024). Sentiment Analysis of Amazon Product Reviews: A Comprehensive Evaluation Using Naïve Bayes Classifiers. Springer Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 856. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-97-7571-2_27
Zhang, Y., et al. (2024). A Comparative Study of Sentiment Analysis on Customer Reviews Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning. Computers, 13(12), 340. MDPI. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-431X/13/12/340
Qorich, M., & El Ouazzani, R. (2024). Analyzing Amazon Products Sentiment: A Comparative Study of Machine and Deep Learning, and Transformer-Based Techniques. Electronics, 13(7), 1305. MDPI. https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/13/7/1305
Sarhan, A.M., et al. (2024). Integrating machine learning and sentiment analysis in movie recommendation systems. Journal of Electrical Systems and Information Technology. https://jesit.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s43067-024-00177-7
Baihaqi, K.A., et al. (2023). A Comparison Support Vector Machine, Logistic Regression And Naïve Bayes For Classification Sentimen Analisys user Mobile App. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 7(1), 64-71. https://ijair.id/index.php/ijair/article/view/962
Adewoye, M.B., et al. (2024). Comprehensive Review of Multiclass Text Classification using the 20 Newsgroup Dataset. International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/386483749
Comparison of Support Vector Machine, Naïve Bayes and Logistic Regression for Assessing the Necessity for Coronary Angiography (2020). PMC. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7558963/
Martínez Marquina, L.T., et al. (2024). Naïve Bayes for Health-Status Predictive Monitoring in COVID-19. Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14848. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-64629-4_7
Technical Documentation:
Scikit-learn Contributors. (2024). 1.9. Naive Bayes. Scikit-learn documentation version 1.7.2. https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/naive_bayes.html
GeeksforGeeks. (2025). Naive Bayes Classifiers. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/machine-learning/naive-bayes-classifiers/
IBM. (2024). What Are Naïve Bayes Classifiers? IBM Topics. https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/naive-bayes
Analytics Vidhya. (2025). Naive Bayes Classifier Explained With Practical Problems. https://www.analyticsvidhya.com/blog/2017/09/naive-bayes-explained/
Historical Sources:
Wikipedia. (2025). Thomas Bayes. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Bayes
Wikipedia. (2025). Naive Bayes classifier. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naive_Bayes_classifier
Wikipedia. (2025). Naive Bayes spam filtering. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naive_Bayes_spam_filtering
Missing the Forest. (2024). 1763: Bayes' Theorem. https://www.missingtheforest.com/1763-bayes-theorem/
Grokipedia. (2025). Naive Bayes spam filtering. https://grokipedia.com/page/Naive_Bayes_spam_filtering
Market Research & Statistics:
AIPRM. (2024). Machine Learning Statistics 2024. https://www.aiprm.com/machine-learning-statistics/
DemandSage. (2025). 70+ Machine Learning Statistics 2025: Industry Market Size. https://www.demandsage.com/machine-learning-statistics/
G2 Learn. (2024). 50+ Machine Learning Statistics That Matter in 2024. https://learn.g2.com/machine-learning-statistics
AI Statistics. (2025). 70 Latest AI Statistics & Trends for 2025 [Global Data]. https://aistatistics.ai/
Statista. (2024). Machine Learning - Worldwide. Statista Market Forecast. https://www.statista.com/outlook/tmo/artificial-intelligence/machine-learning/worldwide
SkyQuest Technology. (2024). Machine Learning Market Size, Share and Trends [2032]. https://www.skyquestt.com/report/machine-learning-market
Maximize Market Research. (2024). Machine Learning Market: Global Industry Analysis and Forecast (2024-2030). https://www.maximizemarketresearch.com/market-report/global-machine-learning-market/23945/
Grand View Research. (2024). Machine Learning Market Size & Share | Industry Report 2030. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/machine-learning-market
Sci-Tech Today. (2025). Machine Learning Statistics By Market Size, Adoption, Business And Facts (2025). https://www.sci-tech-today.com/stats/machine-learning-statistics-updated/
Implementation Guides:
Towards Data Science. (2025). Naïve Bayes Spam Filter — From Scratch. https://towardsdatascience.com/naive-bayes-spam-filter-from-scratch-12970ad3dae7/
Medium. (2024). Comparing Classification Models: Logistic Regression, Naive Bayes, and SVM for Iris Dataset. https://medium.com/@saroknandhini/comparing-classification-models-logistic-regression-naive-bayes-and-svm-for-iris-dataset-9d2c692bceff
Medium. (2018). NLP with the 20 Newsgroups Dataset. https://medium.com/@siyao_sui/nlp-with-the-20-newsgroups-dataset-ab35cd0ea902
Stack Overflow. (2019). Naive Bayes vs. SVM for classifying text data. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/35360081/naive-bayes-vs-svm-for-classifying-text-data
Cross Validated. (2019). Why does Multinomial naive bayes work better than SVM and Logistic Regression on small amount of data. https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/273986/
Additional Technical Resources:
ScienceDirect Topics. Naive Bayes Classifier - an overview. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/naive-bayes-classifier
Turing. An Introduction to Naive Bayes Algorithm for Beginners. https://www.turing.com/kb/an-introduction-to-naive-bayes-algorithm-for-beginners
Simplilearn. (2025). Naive Bayes Classifier. https://www.simplilearn.com/tutorials/machine-learning-tutorial/naive-bayes-classifier
Applied AI Course. (2024). Naive Bayes Algorithm Classifier in Machine Learning. https://www.appliedaicourse.com/blog/naive-bayes-algorithm-classifier-in-machine-learning/
$50
Product Title
Product Details goes here with the simple product description and more information can be seen by clicking the see more button. Product Details goes here with the simple product description and more information can be seen by clicking the see more button
$50
Product Title
Product Details goes here with the simple product description and more information can be seen by clicking the see more button. Product Details goes here with the simple product description and more information can be seen by clicking the see more button.
$50
Product Title
Product Details goes here with the simple product description and more information can be seen by clicking the see more button. Product Details goes here with the simple product description and more information can be seen by clicking the see more button.
Comments