What Is SIEM? Security Information and Event Management — The Complete 2026 Guide
- 1 day ago
- 30 min read
In the first half of 2024 alone, more than 35 billion records were exposed across roughly 9,500 disclosed data breaches (Infosys, 2024). The average breach now costs $4.88 million — a 10% jump over 2023 and the biggest single-year spike since the COVID-19 pandemic (IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report, July 2024). Behind many of those numbers sits one uncomfortable truth: organizations often had the right security tools deployed, but those tools were generating alerts that nobody had time to investigate. SIEM — Security Information and Event Management — was built to solve exactly that problem. It is the central nervous system of a modern Security Operations Center (SOC), pulling data from hundreds of sources, correlating events, and surfacing the threats that actually matter. If you are trying to understand what SIEM is, how it works, and whether it is right for your organization, this guide gives you everything — no hype, no vague diagrams.
Launch your AI Security Information and Event Management Software today, Right Here
TL;DR
SIEM is a cybersecurity platform that collects log and event data from across your IT environment, correlates it in real time, and alerts your security team to genuine threats.
Gartner analysts Mark Nicolett and Amrit Williams coined the term "SIEM" in 2005 by merging two earlier disciplines: Security Information Management (SIM) and Security Event Management (SEM).
The global SIEM market was valued at between $5.1 billion and $12.6 billion in 2024 (depending on scope of measurement) and is projected to grow at a CAGR of 9–17% through the early 2030s, driven by ransomware, regulatory mandates, and cloud expansion.
AI and machine learning are now core to next-generation SIEM, cutting manual investigation time by up to 60% and reducing average breach lifecycles by roughly 100 days.
High-profile failures — Target (2013) and Equifax (2017) — show what happens when monitoring tools generate alerts that teams ignore or when those tools stop working entirely.
SIEM is not a silver bullet. It requires proper tuning, skilled staff, and integration with your broader security stack to deliver its full value.
What Is SIEM?
SIEM (Security Information and Event Management) is a cybersecurity technology that aggregates security data — including logs, alerts, and network events — from across an organization's IT environment. It correlates that data in real time to detect threats, support incident response, and generate compliance reports, all from a single interface. The term was coined by Gartner in 2005.
Table of Contents
1. Background and History of SIEM
The Problem That Created SIEM
Through the late 1990s and into the early 2000s, organizations deployed firewalls, intrusion detection systems (IDS), and antivirus software. Each tool generated its own stream of alerts — thousands per day, in separate formats, stored in separate log files. There was no way to connect the dots. An attacker who tripped a firewall rule in Chicago and accessed a database in Dallas would show up as two unrelated events in two different systems. Security teams were essentially blind to the full story.
Two disciplines were developing in parallel to address parts of this problem:
Security Information Management (SIM) focused on the long-term storage, analysis, and reporting of log data. Think of it as the archive and compliance side of security.
Security Event Management (SEM) focused on real-time monitoring — taking event streams from firewalls and IDS tools and notifying operators when something looked wrong.
Neither discipline alone was enough.
Gartner Coins "SIEM" in 2005
In 2005, Gartner analysts Mark Nicolett and Amrit Williams merged the concepts of SIM and SEM into a single term: Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (TechTarget, 2024). Their definition: a technology that "supports threat detection and security incident response through the real-time collection and historical analysis of security events from a wide variety of event and contextual data sources."
The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) later formalized its own definition in the NIST Glossary: "An application that provides the ability to gather security data from information system components and present that data as actionable information via a single interface." (NIST, ongoing).
Three Generations of SIEM
SIEM 1.0 (2005–2012): Log aggregation and compliance reporting. The main use case was satisfying auditors — PCI DSS, SOX, HIPAA — by proving that you had records. Detection was rule-based and rigid. False positive rates were very high.
SIEM 2.0 (2012–2020): Big data analytics entered the picture. Vendors began integrating user and entity behavior analytics (UEBA), which uses statistical baselines to flag anomalous behavior rather than relying solely on predefined rules. Splunk's rise as a log analytics platform pushed the entire market toward more flexible, data-driven approaches.
SIEM 3.0 / Next-Gen SIEM (2020–present): Cloud-native deployment, machine learning, and integration with Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response (SOAR) capabilities. Detection now spans endpoints, cloud workloads, identities, and operational technology (OT). AI-assisted triage is reducing analyst workloads. Cisco's $28 billion acquisition of Splunk in March 2024 and Palo Alto Networks' $500 million purchase of IBM QRadar's SaaS business in 2024 defined the current era of vendor consolidation (Mordor Intelligence, 2025).
2. How SIEM Works: Core Mechanics
SIEM is a pipeline. Data enters raw, gets processed, and exits as prioritized alerts or reports. Here is how that pipeline works.
Step 1: Data Collection
A SIEM collects data from virtually every component of your IT environment:
Network devices — firewalls, routers, switches, VPNs
Endpoints — laptops, servers, workstations running Windows, Linux, or macOS
Applications — web servers, databases, ERP systems, custom apps
Cloud services — AWS CloudTrail, Azure Monitor, Google Cloud Audit Logs
Identity and access systems — Active Directory, Okta, Azure AD / Entra ID
Security tools — antivirus, EDR, IDS/IPS, web proxies
Operational Technology (OT) — industrial control systems, SCADA environments
Data arrives via agents installed on endpoints, agentless collection through syslog or APIs, or purpose-built connectors provided by the SIEM vendor.
Step 2: Normalization
Raw log data is messy. A Cisco firewall writes its logs differently from a Microsoft Windows event log. Normalization converts all incoming data into a common schema so it can be searched and compared consistently. Without normalization, correlation is impossible.
Step 3: Correlation
Correlation is what separates SIEM from a simple log archive. The SIEM applies correlation rules — logic that links separate events into a coherent threat narrative. A simple correlation rule might be: "If a user fails to log in five times in two minutes and then succeeds, trigger an alert." A more complex rule might: "If a user accesses sensitive files outside their normal working hours, from a new IP address, following a recently received phishing email flagged by the email gateway, escalate to critical."
Modern SIEMs use both rule-based correlation and machine learning-based anomaly detection. Machine learning builds behavioral baselines for users, devices, and network segments — then flags deviations that rules alone would miss.
Step 4: Alerting and Prioritization
Not every correlation match becomes a high-priority alert. SIEM platforms score alerts based on asset criticality (is the affected system a payment server or a test laptop?), threat intelligence context (is the IP address known to be malicious?), and confidence level. This scoring helps analysts focus on what matters first.
Step 5: Investigation and Response
When an analyst opens an alert, the SIEM provides a timeline view showing every event related to the incident — across all data sources — in chronological order. This is the forensic context that makes investigation possible. Some SIEMs include built-in playbooks or integrate with SOAR platforms to automate initial response steps like blocking an IP address or isolating an endpoint.
Step 6: Retention and Reporting
SIEMs store logs for extended periods — typically 90 days to several years, depending on regulatory requirements. This retention supports forensic investigations after a breach and satisfies compliance mandates under HIPAA, PCI DSS, GDPR, SOX, NIS2, and DORA. Dashboards and automated reports reduce the manual effort of preparing compliance documentation.
3. Key SIEM Capabilities
Capability | What It Does | Why It Matters |
Log Management | Collects and stores logs from all sources | Compliance, forensics, historical baseline |
Real-Time Monitoring | Processes event streams as they arrive | Catches fast-moving attacks before they spread |
Event Correlation | Links related events across sources | Reveals multi-stage attacks invisible to individual tools |
Threat Intelligence Integration | Enriches alerts with known-bad IPs, domains, hashes | Reduces investigation time |
UEBA | Profiles user and device behavior; flags anomalies | Detects insider threats and compromised accounts |
Compliance Reporting | Pre-built reports mapped to regulatory frameworks | Reduces audit preparation time |
Incident Response Workflow | Ticketing, playbooks, case management | Standardizes and speeds up analyst response |
Cloud Workload Monitoring | Collects telemetry from AWS, Azure, GCP | Extends visibility into cloud-native environments |
4. The SIEM Market in 2026
Market Size
Multiple research firms have sized the SIEM market differently based on scope, but the directional consensus is clear — the market is large and growing fast. Grand View Research (November 2025) estimated the 2024 market at $5.12 billion, projecting growth to $18.22 billion by 2033 at a CAGR of 15.3%. Kings Research (November 2025) estimated 2024 at $12.56 billion — a broader scope that includes managed SIEM services — projecting $31.45 billion by 2032. Mordor Intelligence (June 2025) placed the 2025 market at $10.78 billion, growing to $19.13 billion by 2030 at a 12.16% CAGR.
The variation reflects different definitions of "SIEM market" (standalone software vs. including managed services and adjacent tools), but any way you measure it, SIEM is a multi-billion-dollar, double-digit-growth market.
Key Market Statistics (2024–2026)
Metric | Value | Source / Date |
Global SIEM market size (2024) | $5.1B–$12.6B (scope-dependent) | Grand View Research / Kings Research, 2025 |
Global SIEM market size (2025 est.) | ~$10.78 billion | Mordor Intelligence, June 2025 |
Projected 2030 market size | $19.13 billion | Mordor Intelligence, June 2025 |
CAGR (2025–2030) | 12.16% | Mordor Intelligence, June 2025 |
Managed SIEM services CAGR (2025–2030) | 17.20% | Mordor Intelligence, June 2025 |
North America revenue share (2024) | 34–39% | Various, 2025 |
BFSI end-user revenue share (2024) | 23–27% | Various, 2025 |
Platform software share of SIEM revenue | 63.10% | Mordor Intelligence, June 2025 |
Average global cost of a data breach (2024) | $4.88 million | IBM / Ponemon Institute, July 2024 |
Key Vendor Milestones (2024–2026)
Three landmark deals in 2024 reshaped the competitive landscape:
Cisco acquires Splunk (March 2024) for $28 billion. This combined Cisco's network telemetry and security portfolio with Splunk's analytics platform, creating a full-stack observability and security suite. (Mordor Intelligence, June 2025)
Palo Alto Networks acquires IBM QRadar SaaS for $500 million (2024). IBM's QRadar SaaS business folded into Palo Alto's Cortex line, aligning SOC operations, XDR, and automation under one roof. (Mordor Intelligence, June 2025)
Exabeam and LogRhythm merge for approximately $3.5 billion (2024). The merger pooled Exabeam's UEBA expertise with LogRhythm's log ingestion and management capabilities, creating the largest pure-play SIEM vendor. (Mordor Intelligence, June 2025)
In addition, Microsoft Sentinel gained significant momentum in 2025 through deep integration with Microsoft Defender and Entra ID. Rapid7 launched "Incident Command" in July 2025, a next-generation SIEM integrated into its Command Platform combining exposure management with detection and response using agentic AI workflows. (Kings Research, November 2025) CrowdStrike acquired Pangea in September 2025 to build the first AI Detection and Response (AIDR) solution into its Falcon platform. (Kings Research, November 2025)
5. Top SIEM Platforms Compared
Note: This comparison reflects publicly available information as of early 2026. Pricing ranges, vendor capabilities, and product names change frequently. Always request a current vendor demo and pricing sheet before making a purchase decision.
Platform | Deployment | Key Strength | Best For | Pricing Model |
Microsoft Sentinel | Cloud-native (Azure) | Native Microsoft ecosystem integration | Organizations on Azure / Microsoft 365 | Pay-per-GB ingested |
Splunk (Cisco) | Cloud, on-prem, hybrid | Flexible SPL query language; huge app ecosystem | Large enterprises with complex environments | Workload-based or ingest-based |
IBM QRadar (on-prem) | On-premises | Mature rule engine; deep network analytics | Regulated industries requiring air-gap | Per-EPS (Events Per Second) |
Palo Alto Cortex XSIAM | Cloud-native | XDR + SIEM unified; AI-driven | Organizations running Palo Alto networks/endpoints | Subscription |
Exabeam (merged LogRhythm) | Cloud, on-prem | UEBA; user behavior analytics | Insider threat detection; mid-to-large enterprise | Per-user or per-endpoint |
Google Chronicle (SIEM) | Cloud-native (GCP) | Petabyte-scale; flat-rate pricing | Large data volumes; GCP environments | Flat-rate (not per-GB) |
Securonix | Cloud-native | Sector-specific use cases; threat content | Regulated industries (healthcare, finance, energy) | Subscription |
Elastic Security (SIEM) | Cloud or self-managed | Open source core; low cost to start | Cost-sensitive teams; developer-friendly SOCs | Open source + commercial tiers |
6. Case Studies: When SIEM Saves You — and When Its Absence Hurts You
Case Study 1: Target Corporation (2013) — Alerts Ignored
Organization: Target Corporation, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
Date of Incident: November–December 2013
What happened:
In September 2013, cybercriminals phished an employee of Fazio Mechanical Services, a Pennsylvania-based HVAC vendor with legitimate remote access to Target's network. Using the stolen credentials, attackers entered Target's network on approximately November 15, 2013, and installed BlackPOS malware on point-of-sale (POS) systems across 1,797 stores by November 27 — the start of the Black Friday shopping weekend.
Here is what makes this case critical for SIEM discussions: Target had a monitoring system in place. The company had deployed FireEye anti-malware technology, which generated alerts about the malicious activity in late November. Target's security operations center (SOC) in Minneapolis received those alerts. They did not act on them.
A U.S. Senate investigation (published March 2014) later documented that the alerts were visible and that the security team did not escalate or investigate. Analysts for Target's India-based support team reportedly recommended action — their Minneapolis counterparts did not follow through. The breach ran undetected until December 12, when the U.S. Department of Justice contacted Target about suspicious activity it had detected.
Outcome: 40 million credit and debit card numbers stolen. 70 million customers' personal records exposed. Total costs exceeded $202 million (Huntress, 2025). An $18.5 million multistate settlement followed in 2017. Target's CEO and CIO both resigned in 2014. (Portnox, October 2025)
SIEM Lesson: A SIEM — or any monitoring system — is only as good as the human response it triggers. Alert fatigue and inadequate staffing rendered functional tooling ineffective. This is why SIEM tuning, proper alert prioritization, and staffed SOC teams are non-negotiable. Generating an alert and investigating an alert are two different things.
Case Study 2: Equifax (2017) — The Monitor That Stopped Monitoring
Organization: Equifax, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Date of Incident: May 12 – July 29, 2017
What happened:
Equifax operated one of the largest consumer credit data repositories in the world, holding personally identifiable information on hundreds of millions of people. On March 7, 2017, the Apache Software Foundation disclosed a critical vulnerability in Apache Struts (CVE-2017-5638), issuing a patch immediately. Security experts observed threat actors scanning for unpatched systems as early as March 10. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security notified Equifax on March 8.
Equifax ran a vulnerability scan on March 15. The scan failed to identify the exposure — the scanning software was not properly configured. The online dispute portal remained unpatched. (Wikipedia – 2017 Equifax data breach, updated December 2025)
Attackers entered Equifax's systems on May 12, 2017. Using the Apache Struts vulnerability, they gained initial access and then moved laterally through the network, executing approximately 9,000 queries against databases containing sensitive personal data. (Breachsense, 2025)
Here is the crucial SIEM element: Equifax had network monitoring tools deployed to inspect encrypted outbound traffic. Those tools relied on a valid SSL certificate to decrypt and analyze what was leaving the network. That certificate had expired in January 2017 — nine months before the breach was discovered. Because the certificate was expired, the monitoring tools could not decrypt the attackers' encrypted exfiltration. The outbound data theft looked like routine HTTPS traffic. Nobody noticed the expired certificate for over six months.
On July 29, 2017, an Equifax IT administrator renewed the SSL certificate. Within hours, the monitoring tools flagged suspicious activity. The exploit was shut down by July 30. By then, attackers had been inside for 78 days. (Wikipedia – 2017 Equifax data breach, December 2025; U.S. House Oversight Committee Report, December 2018)
Outcome: 147.9 million Americans' records exposed, along with 15.2 million British and approximately 19,000 Canadian citizens' records. (Wikipedia) Equifax reached a settlement of up to $700 million with the FTC, CFPB, and all 50 U.S. states. The CIO and Chief Security Officer both took early retirement on September 15, 2017. (Breachsense, 2025) In February 2020, the U.S. government indicted members of China's People's Liberation Army for the attack. (Wikipedia)
SIEM Lesson: Security monitoring infrastructure requires active maintenance. An expired certificate, a misconfigured agent, a tool that silently stops working — any of these can create a blind spot that attackers exploit. SIEM health monitoring — dashboards that show not just threat detections but the operational status of the monitoring tools themselves — is essential.
Case Study 3: NCB Management Services (2023) — Three-Day Blind Spot
Organization: NCB Management Services, a U.S.-based debt collection firm
Date of Incident: Early 2023
What happened:
NCB Management Services suffered a data breach in early 2023 that potentially impacted over one million customers. Compromised data included credit and debit card numbers, security codes, access codes, and PINs. The breach involved hacking into NCB's systems, but the company was unaware of its own compromise until three days after the initial intrusion. (Stellar Cyber, December 2025)
The three-day gap illustrates exactly the problem SIEM is designed to solve: without real-time correlation of log data across systems, a breach can go unnoticed until damage is already done.
Outcome: More than one million customers had highly sensitive financial credentials exposed. The incident drew regulatory attention and led to significant remediation costs. Regulatory frameworks like SOX, which governs data access controls, require verifiable monitoring — a gap NCB's architecture clearly exhibited. (Stellar Cyber, December 2025)
SIEM Lesson: Detection speed is directly tied to breach cost. IBM's 2024 Cost of a Data Breach Report found that organizations who detected breaches internally — using security tools and teams — saved nearly $1 million compared to those who discovered the breach via external disclosure. Every day of dwell time is money lost. (IBM, July 2024)
7. Industry and Regional Variations
Industries That Use SIEM Most
Banking, Financial Services, and Insurance (BFSI) leads SIEM adoption, holding 23–27% of the global revenue share in 2024 (Kings Research, November 2025; Mordor Intelligence, June 2025). Financial firms face regulatory mandates including SOX, PCI DSS, and GLBA, all of which require detailed logging and monitoring. The average data breach cost for financial services firms reached $6.08 million in 2024 — 22% above the global average. (IBM, July 2024)
Healthcare sees the highest breach costs of any industry — $9.77 million per breach in 2024, a figure driven by the sensitivity of patient data and strict HIPAA requirements. (IBM, July 2024). In May 2023, Norton Healthcare suffered a ransomware attack that exposed data for 2.5 million patients, including Social Security numbers and medical identification numbers. (Stellar Cyber, December 2025) Healthcare organizations continue to expand SIEM adoption as a core component of HIPAA compliance.
Energy and Utilities is the fastest-growing end-user segment for SIEM, projected to advance at a 14.60% CAGR through 2030 (Mordor Intelligence, June 2025). The convergence of IT and OT networks — connecting industrial control systems to corporate networks — dramatically expands the attack surface. Germany's manufacturing sector, with its deep embrace of Industry 4.0, is a notable driver of European SIEM adoption.
Government and Defense organizations use SIEM to meet compliance frameworks like FISMA (U.S. federal systems) and the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC). FedRAMP-authorized SIEM solutions (including Microsoft Sentinel and Splunk) are required for U.S. federal cloud environments.
Regional Snapshot
Region | 2024 Revenue Share | Key Drivers |
North America | 34–39% | SOX, PCI DSS, CCPA, high enterprise IT spending |
Europe | Second largest | NIS2 Directive, GDPR, DORA (financial sector) |
Asia-Pacific | Fastest growing (11.8–13.1% CAGR) | Cloud adoption, digital transformation, regulatory catch-up |
Latin America | Emerging | Lower adoption; growing ransomware pressure driving interest |
The EU's NIS2 Directive (effective October 2024) and DORA (Digital Operational Resilience Act, effective January 2025) have materially accelerated SIEM spending across European enterprises, particularly in financial services. Organizations in NIS2-covered sectors (energy, transport, health, digital infrastructure) face significant fines for inadequate monitoring and incident reporting. (Mordor Intelligence, June 2025)
8. SIEM Pros and Cons
Pros
Centralized visibility. A SIEM is the single pane of glass across your entire security estate. Instead of logging into 15 different tools, an analyst sees correlated data from all of them in one place.
Faster detection. IBM's 2024 report found that organizations using AI and automation extensively in their security operations — the hallmark of next-gen SIEM — identified and contained breaches nearly 100 days faster than those without these capabilities. (IBM, July 2024)
Compliance made manageable. SIEM platforms include pre-built reports mapped to PCI DSS, HIPAA, GDPR, SOX, ISO 27001, and other frameworks. This dramatically reduces the labor cost of audit preparation.
Forensic capability. Historical log retention — days to years — means you can reconstruct exactly what happened during a breach, which is critical for both legal proceedings and improving future defenses.
Insider threat detection. UEBA within modern SIEMs can flag employees accessing data they have no business reason to access, or unusual data transfers — behaviors that rule-based tools miss entirely.
AI-powered cost savings. Organizations with extensive use of security AI and automation in prevention workflows incurred on average $2.2 million less per breach compared to those with no AI use. (IBM, July 2024)
Cons
Cost. Enterprise SIEM licenses are expensive. Ingestion-based pricing (common with cloud-native SIEMs) can surprise buyers when log volumes increase. Hardware tariffs raised appliance costs by as much as 20% during 2024. (Mordor Intelligence, June 2025) Hidden fees for storage, egress, and premium analytics add to total cost of ownership.
Complexity. A SIEM requires significant tuning to reduce false positives to manageable levels. Out-of-the-box rules are rarely optimized for your specific environment. This takes expert knowledge and ongoing effort.
Staffing requirement. SIEM generates value only when skilled analysts review and act on its alerts. The global cybersecurity workforce shortage is severe — IBM found that organizations facing severe staffing shortages paid $1.76 million more per breach on average. (IBM, July 2024) A SIEM without enough staff to operate it can create a false sense of security.
Alert fatigue. Poorly tuned SIEMs generate enormous numbers of false positives. This overloads analysts, erodes trust in the system, and — as the Target case showed — can lead to real alerts being dismissed alongside the noise.
Legacy system limitations. Traditional, on-premises SIEM systems struggle with cloud telemetry volumes, real-time analytics at scale, and adapting to novel attack techniques. Migration to next-gen cloud-native SIEM is complex and costly.
9. SIEM vs. Related Technologies
SIEM vs. SOAR
SOAR (Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response) automates incident response actions. Where SIEM detects and alerts, SOAR reacts — automatically blocking an IP address, isolating an endpoint, or creating a ticket. Most modern SIEM platforms include SOAR capabilities or integrate natively with standalone SOAR tools. Think of SIEM as the detection layer and SOAR as the response layer; together they form the backbone of a modern SOC.
SIEM vs. XDR
XDR (Extended Detection and Response) is a newer concept that unifies detection and response across endpoints, networks, email, and cloud environments into a single platform. XDR differs from SIEM in that it is more opinionated — it typically works best when most of your security controls come from the same vendor family. SIEM is more open and accepts data from virtually any source. Organizations that standardize on a single vendor (e.g., all Microsoft, or all Palo Alto) may find XDR sufficient; organizations with diverse, multi-vendor environments typically need SIEM's broader ingestion.
IBM's 2024 Cost of a Data Breach Report found that 44% of organizations deployed XDR, reducing detection and containment time by about 29 days compared to those without XDR. (IBM, July 2024)
SIEM vs. Log Management
A log management tool simply collects and stores logs. It provides search and archive functionality but does not correlate events or generate intelligent alerts. Log management is a component of SIEM, not a replacement for it.
SIEM vs. EDR
EDR (Endpoint Detection and Response) focuses specifically on endpoint activity — processes, file changes, network connections from individual devices. SIEM aggregates EDR data (along with data from dozens of other sources) and correlates it across the entire environment. EDR tells you what happened on one device; SIEM tells you how that fits into the bigger attack picture.
Technology | Primary Function | Scope | Best Used For |
SIEM | Correlation, alerting, compliance | Entire IT environment | SOC operations; regulatory compliance |
SOAR | Automated incident response | Integrated with SIEM/XDR | Playbook automation; reducing manual response |
XDR | Unified detection + response | Endpoints, network, cloud (vendor-specific) | Streamlined security in single-vendor environments |
EDR | Endpoint threat detection | Individual devices | Malware analysis; endpoint forensics |
Log Management | Log storage and search | Any IT system | Compliance archiving; ad hoc investigation |
10. Myths vs. Facts
Myth: SIEM is only for large enterprises.
Fact: Cloud-native SIEM platforms now offer consumption-based pricing that makes entry accessible to SMBs. Microsoft Sentinel, Google Chronicle, and managed SIEM services allow smaller organizations to start small and scale. The managed SIEM services segment — where a third party operates the SIEM on your behalf — is growing at 17.0–17.2% CAGR, explicitly targeting the mid-market. (Polaris Market Research, 2025; Mordor Intelligence, June 2025)
Myth: Deploying a SIEM means you are secure.
Fact: The Target breach in 2013 proves the opposite. Target had monitoring tools generating accurate alerts. The breach succeeded because those alerts were not investigated. SIEM is a detection tool. It does not prevent attacks — it enables humans (or automated playbooks) to respond to them.
Myth: More data in the SIEM equals better security.
Fact: More data often means more noise. Organizations that ingest every log from every device without filtering tend to drown in false positives. Effective SIEM deployment requires careful data source prioritization — ingest what matters most for threat detection and compliance, not everything that is technically possible.
Myth: AI/ML will eventually automate away the need for security analysts.
Fact: AI has reduced alert investigation time by up to 60% in AI-enabled SIEM environments (Mordor Intelligence, June 2025), but human judgment remains essential for complex incident response, threat hunting, and interpreting ambiguous context. IBM's 2024 report noted that staffing shortages still added $1.76 million in average breach costs — underscoring that human expertise is not replaceable, only augmented.
Myth: SIEM replaces other security tools.
Fact: SIEM aggregates and correlates data from other tools. It does not replace firewalls, EDR, IDS/IPS, or identity platforms. It makes all of those tools more valuable by connecting their telemetry into a unified detection layer.
Myth: On-premises SIEM is dead.
Fact: The on-premises SIEM segment is expected to reach $12.60 billion by 2032 as regulated industries with data residency requirements (healthcare, defense, certain financial services) continue to require local deployments. (Kings Research, November 2025) The shift is toward cloud-first, not cloud-only.
11. How to Deploy SIEM: Step-by-Step Framework
This is a practical deployment framework for organizations standing up or significantly upgrading a SIEM. Timelines and complexity vary significantly based on organization size and existing infrastructure.
Phase 1: Define Scope and Goals (Weeks 1–2)
Start with the business question, not the technology. Ask: What are we trying to detect? What are we required to prove to regulators? What is our budget for people and technology?
Document your regulatory obligations (PCI DSS, HIPAA, NIS2, etc.). Map your most critical assets — the systems that, if compromised, would cause the greatest business or legal damage. These assets should be the first data sources onboarded to the SIEM.
Phase 2: Select a Platform and Architecture (Weeks 3–6)
Evaluate platforms based on: deployment model (cloud-native vs. on-premises vs. hybrid), pricing model (per-GB vs. per-EPS vs. flat-rate), integration with your existing security stack, total cost of ownership including staff time, and vendor roadmap.
Establish your data retention requirements. PCI DSS requires one year of log retention, with 90 days available for immediate analysis. HIPAA requires six years. GDPR requires data minimization — retain only what you have a legal basis to keep.
Phase 3: Data Source Onboarding (Weeks 4–16)
Start with your highest-value, highest-risk data sources:
Identity and access management logs (Active Directory / Entra ID, Okta)
Perimeter security devices (firewalls, VPN gateways)
Endpoint security tools (EDR, AV)
Servers hosting critical applications and data
Cloud environment logs (AWS CloudTrail, Azure Monitor, GCP Cloud Logging)
Email gateway logs
Web proxy and DNS logs
Resist the urge to onboard everything at once. Start narrow, get good data quality, then expand.
Phase 4: Tune Detection Rules and Baselines (Weeks 8–20, ongoing)
Out-of-the-box rules generate false positives. You must tune them to your environment. This involves: identifying and whitelisting legitimate but unusual behaviors (e.g., a nightly backup job that runs from unusual hours), adjusting thresholds, and adding environmental context (e.g., which IP ranges are your VPN endpoints, which service accounts are authorized to access sensitive databases).
Machine learning baselines require 2–6 weeks of "learning" time before they produce useful anomaly alerts.
Phase 5: Establish Response Workflows (Weeks 12–20)
Define playbooks for your most common alert types. Who gets paged when a critical alert fires at 2 a.m.? What are the first five steps when you suspect a compromised account? What is the escalation path? Document these before you need them.
Integrate your SIEM with your incident management platform (ServiceNow, Jira, PagerDuty) so alerts automatically create trackable tickets.
Phase 6: Measure, Review, and Improve (Ongoing)
Track: mean time to detect (MTTD), mean time to respond (MTTR), false positive rate, alert volume by severity, and rule coverage against the MITRE ATT&CK framework. Review your use case library quarterly. Run tabletop exercises using your SIEM data to test analyst readiness.
12. Common Pitfalls and Risks
Skipping tuning. Installing a SIEM and accepting its default rules is the most common deployment failure. Default rules produce massive false positive volumes, burn out analysts, and erode confidence in the platform within months.
Ignoring data quality. Garbage in, garbage out. If a critical server is not sending logs, or if its clock is not synchronized (timestamps matter enormously for correlation), your SIEM will miss real attacks on that system.
Forgetting the monitoring tools themselves. The Equifax breach was prolonged by an expired SSL certificate that silently disabled the monitoring infrastructure. Build health monitoring for your SIEM and its data sources — alert if a data source goes silent.
Underestimating the staffing requirement. A SIEM is a force multiplier for security analysts, not a replacement for them. Plan for how many hours per week your team will spend reviewing alerts and investigating incidents, and staff accordingly.
Locking in on per-event pricing without modeling log growth. Cloud workload adoption, new SaaS tools, and new regulation can double your log volume in 12 months. Model your expected growth before signing a per-GB or per-EPS contract.
Treating SIEM as a set-and-forget system. Your IT environment changes constantly — new cloud services, new applications, new threat actors. Your SIEM use case library, correlation rules, and data source coverage must evolve in parallel.
Storing PII in SIEM logs without legal review. GDPR, CCPA, and similar regulations require careful thought about what personal data you are allowed to retain and for how long. SIEM logs often contain usernames, IP addresses, email addresses, and other data classified as personal under these laws. Legal counsel should review your retention policy.
13. The Future of SIEM: AI, XDR, and What Comes Next
AI Is the Most Important Shift in a Decade
The integration of AI and machine learning into SIEM is not a marketing claim — the data backs it up. IBM's 2024 Cost of a Data Breach Report found that organizations with extensive use of AI in prevention workflows saved an average of $2.2 million per breach compared to those without AI. Breach lifecycles were reduced by nearly 100 days. (IBM, July 2024)
CrowdStrike's LogScale unit — now part of Falcon — reached $220 million in ARR by embedding machine learning that maps raw telemetry to MITRE ATT&CK tactics in real time. (Mordor Intelligence, June 2025) Manufacturers deploying AI-enabled SIEM cut manual investigation time by up to 60%. (Mordor Intelligence, June 2025)
Generative AI is entering the SOC analyst workflow in 2025–2026 through natural-language query interfaces (asking the SIEM a question in plain English instead of writing a query language), automated threat summaries, and AI-drafted incident reports. IBM's 2024 report noted that organizations using generative AI security tools saw a positive impact on breach costs, mitigating average costs by more than $167,000 per breach. (IBM, July 2024)
The Rise of Cloud-Native and Consumption-Based SIEM
Cloud workload security monitoring is the fastest-growing SIEM application segment, projected at a 19.90% CAGR through 2030 (Mordor Intelligence, June 2025). As organizations shift workloads to AWS, Azure, and GCP, they generate telemetry volumes that overwhelm on-premises SIEM hardware. Cloud-native SIEMs like Microsoft Sentinel and Google Chronicle process petabytes-scale data natively.
Flat-rate pricing models — where you pay a fixed monthly fee regardless of data volume — are growing in popularity as buyers react against unpredictable per-GB bills. Google Chronicle pioneered this approach in the enterprise market.
SIEM and XDR Are Converging
The boundary between SIEM and XDR is blurring. Platforms like Palo Alto Cortex XSIAM, Microsoft's Unified Security Operations Platform (which integrates Sentinel and Defender XDR), and CrowdStrike Falcon Next-Gen SIEM embed detection, investigation, and response in a single cloud-native platform. For organizations that can standardize on a single vendor ecosystem, this convergence delivers significant simplicity and speed gains.
For organizations with heterogeneous environments — multiple endpoint tools, legacy on-premises systems, multiple cloud providers — standalone SIEM or open-architecture SIEM platforms remain essential.
Regulatory Pressure Is Intensifying
EU NIS2 and DORA are reshaping European SIEM spending. U.S. SEC cybersecurity disclosure rules (effective December 2023) require public companies to disclose material cybersecurity incidents within four business days, accelerating the business case for faster detection. CMMC 2.0 in the U.S. defense industrial base mandates logging and monitoring controls that SIEM directly addresses. This regulatory acceleration will sustain SIEM investment growth through the late 2020s regardless of broader IT spending cycles.
14. FAQ
Q1: What does SIEM stand for?
SIEM stands for Security Information and Event Management. Gartner analysts Mark Nicolett and Amrit Williams coined the term in 2005, combining Security Information Management (SIM) and Security Event Management (SEM) into a unified concept. NIST defines SIEM as an "application that provides the ability to gather security data from information system components and present that data as actionable information via a single interface."
Q2: What is the difference between SIM and SEM?
SIM (Security Information Management) focuses on long-term storage, analysis, and reporting of log data — the archive and compliance side. SEM (Security Event Management) focuses on real-time monitoring and alerting — the live detection side. SIEM combines both into a single platform.
Q3: Do small businesses need SIEM?
Not every small business needs a full enterprise SIEM, but many do need at minimum centralized log management and basic monitoring. Cloud-native SIEMs with consumption-based pricing and managed SIEM service providers have made meaningful security monitoring accessible to businesses with as few as 50 employees. If you process payment cards, handle health data, or operate under any regulatory framework, you almost certainly need some form of SIEM or equivalent monitoring capability.
Q4: What is UEBA and how does it relate to SIEM?
UEBA stands for User and Entity Behavior Analytics. It uses machine learning to build behavioral baselines for individual users and devices, then flags deviations. Modern SIEMs include UEBA as a core capability — it is how SIEMs detect insider threats and compromised accounts that follow normal patterns initially but then behave abnormally (e.g., downloading sensitive files at 3 a.m. after a decade of 9-to-5 access patterns).
Q5: How long does it take to deploy a SIEM?
A basic SIEM with core data sources onboarded and rules tuned typically requires three to six months for a mid-sized organization. Enterprise deployments with hundreds of data sources and complex compliance requirements can take 12–18 months. Managed SIEM services can accelerate initial deployment significantly.
Q6: What is alert fatigue in SIEM, and how is it addressed?
Alert fatigue is when security analysts receive so many alerts — many of them false positives — that they start ignoring or dismissing alerts without proper investigation. It was a contributing factor in the Target breach. It is addressed through proper tuning (adjusting rules to match your environment), alert prioritization and scoring, AI-assisted triage that filters noise, and SOAR automation that handles low-complexity alerts automatically so analysts focus on high-complexity ones.
Q7: What regulations require SIEM?
No regulation explicitly mandates "SIEM" by name, but many require capabilities that SIEM delivers — log management, event monitoring, anomaly detection, and audit reporting. PCI DSS Requirement 10 mandates logging and monitoring of access to cardholder data. HIPAA Security Rule requires information system activity reviews. SOX requires verifiable controls around financial data access. EU NIS2 and DORA require incident monitoring and reporting. FISMA governs U.S. federal systems. ISO 27001 Annex A.12 addresses logging and monitoring.
Q8: What is a managed SIEM service?
A managed SIEM (or MSSP-delivered SIEM) is where a third-party Managed Security Service Provider (MSSP) deploys, operates, and monitors the SIEM on your behalf. Your team receives escalated alerts and reports, while the MSSP handles tuning, infrastructure maintenance, and 24/7 monitoring. The managed SIEM market was valued at $6.39 billion in 2024 and is growing at a 17.0% CAGR. (Polaris Market Research, 2025)
Q9: What is the MITRE ATT&CK framework and why is it important for SIEM?
MITRE ATT&CK is a publicly available knowledge base of adversary tactics and techniques, maintained by the MITRE Corporation. SIEM vendors and security teams use it to map detection rules and use cases to specific attacker behaviors — ensuring that detection coverage is systematic rather than ad hoc. AI-enabled SIEMs like CrowdStrike LogScale automatically map telemetry to ATT&CK tactics in real time.
Q10: What is the difference between cloud-native SIEM and on-premises SIEM?
Cloud-native SIEM runs in a vendor-managed cloud environment. It scales elastically, eliminates hardware management, and typically offers consumption-based pricing. On-premises SIEM runs on hardware you own and operate in your own data center. It offers maximum data control, suits air-gapped environments, and is required by some regulatory frameworks with strict data residency requirements. Hybrid SIEM combines both, typically routing sensitive logs to on-premises storage while using cloud resources for analytics.
Q11: How does SIEM handle cloud environments?
Modern SIEM platforms ingest native cloud telemetry through APIs and purpose-built connectors — AWS CloudTrail, Azure Monitor / Sentinel integration, Google Cloud Audit Logs. Cloud workload security monitoring is the fastest-growing SIEM application segment at 19.90% CAGR (Mordor Intelligence, June 2025). Microsoft Sentinel, in particular, benefits from native integration with Azure services and Microsoft 365, reducing the connector complexity that challenged earlier cloud monitoring approaches.
Q12: How much does a SIEM cost?
SIEM pricing varies widely by vendor, deployment model, and data volume. Cloud-native SIEMs may charge $0.50–$3.00 per GB of data ingested per day, plus storage and premium analytics fees. Enterprise on-premises licenses are typically per Events Per Second (EPS), ranging from tens of thousands to millions of dollars annually. Managed SIEM services typically charge a monthly per-device or per-user fee. Always model your projected data volume and run a proof of concept before committing to a contract.
Q13: What is the relationship between SIEM and the Security Operations Center (SOC)?
The SOC is the team of security analysts who monitor, detect, investigate, and respond to cybersecurity threats. SIEM is the primary technology platform that the SOC uses to do its job. The SOC is the human layer; the SIEM is the technological layer. Neither is effective without the other.
Q14: How does SIEM help with incident response?
When a security incident occurs, the SIEM provides the forensic timeline — every event, from every data source, in chronological order, that is related to the incident. This tells analysts when the attacker first appeared, how they moved through the network, what they accessed, and where they exfiltrated data. The SIEM's historical retention (days to years) is essential for this reconstruction. Many SIEMs also integrate with case management platforms to track investigation steps and document response actions.
Q15: Can SIEM detect ransomware?
Yes, SIEM can detect ransomware in its early stages — before encryption begins. Ransomware typically follows a pattern: initial access via phishing or credential theft, lateral movement, privilege escalation, large-scale file access or copy operations, and eventually encryption. Each of these stages generates detectable signals that a well-tuned SIEM can correlate into an alert. The key is speed: catching ransomware during lateral movement, before encryption starts, dramatically reduces damage.
15. Key Takeaways
SIEM merges security log storage (SIM) and real-time event monitoring (SEM) into a single platform. Gartner coined the term in 2005.
The SIEM's core job is correlation — linking separate events across dozens of data sources into coherent threat narratives that reveal multi-stage attacks.
The global SIEM market is valued at approximately $10.78 billion in 2025, growing at a 12.16% CAGR to reach $19.13 billion by 2030 (Mordor Intelligence, June 2025).
Three major acquisitions in 2024 — Cisco/Splunk ($28B), Palo Alto/IBM QRadar SaaS ($500M), Exabeam/LogRhythm ($3.5B) — indicate the market is consolidating around AI-powered, cloud-native platforms.
The average data breach now costs $4.88 million globally. Organizations using AI extensively in their security operations save an average of $2.2 million per breach (IBM, July 2024).
Both the Target (2013) and Equifax (2017) breaches demonstrate that having monitoring tools is not enough — those tools must be functioning, tuned, and acted upon.
SIEM is not a standalone security solution. It amplifies the value of every other security tool in your environment by connecting their data.
Proper SIEM deployment requires a phased approach: define scope first, onboard high-value data sources, tune rules aggressively, and build human response workflows before expanding data sources.
SIEM is converging with XDR, SOAR, and AI-assisted detection and response in next-generation security operations platforms.
Regulatory pressure — NIS2, DORA, SEC disclosure rules, CMMC — is driving SIEM adoption beyond early-adopter large enterprises into mid-market and regulated industries globally.
16. Actionable Next Steps
Assess your current monitoring posture. Audit what security logs you are currently collecting, where they are stored, how long they are retained, and who reviews them. Identify gaps relative to your regulatory obligations.
Define your top five threat scenarios. Before evaluating SIEM products, document the specific threats you are most concerned about (e.g., ransomware via phishing, insider data theft, compromised cloud credentials). This drives your use case requirements.
Map your regulatory obligations. Identify every compliance framework that applies to your organization (PCI DSS, HIPAA, GDPR, NIS2, SOX, FISMA, etc.) and document the specific logging and monitoring controls each requires.
Evaluate three to five SIEM platforms through proof of concept. Do not buy a SIEM based on marketing materials. Run a 30–60 day PoC with real data from your environment. Measure alert quality, integration ease, and analyst experience.
Size your staffing requirement. Determine realistically how many analyst hours per week your SIEM will require. If you cannot staff a 24/7 SOC, evaluate managed SIEM services as a complement or alternative.
Plan your data source onboarding sequence. Prioritize identity logs, perimeter devices, and your most critical servers before expanding to all endpoints and cloud services.
Establish health monitoring for your monitoring tools. Implement alerts for when data sources go silent — don't replicate the Equifax SSL certificate failure. Your SIEM must monitor itself.
Schedule quarterly tuning reviews. Block time every three months to review your rule set, false positive rates, and data source coverage. The threat landscape changes; your detection should too.
17. Glossary
Alert fatigue — The desensitization of security analysts caused by excessive volumes of alerts, many of which are false positives. Leads to real threats being dismissed or ignored.
APT (Advanced Persistent Threat) — A prolonged, targeted cyberattack in which an attacker gains access to a network and remains undetected for an extended period to steal data or conduct espionage.
Correlation rule — Logic within a SIEM that links two or more separate events from different data sources to identify a potential threat.
CAGR (Compound Annual Growth Rate) — The annualized growth rate of a market or metric over a specified time period.
CMMC (Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification) — A U.S. Department of Defense framework requiring defense contractors to demonstrate cybersecurity capabilities at varying levels.
DORA (Digital Operational Resilience Act) — EU regulation effective January 2025 requiring financial services firms to demonstrate digital resilience, including continuous monitoring and incident reporting.
Dwell time — The length of time an attacker is inside a victim's network before being detected.
EDR (Endpoint Detection and Response) — Security technology focused on detecting and investigating threats on individual devices (endpoints).
EPS (Events Per Second) — A measure of log volume used in some SIEM pricing models.
FISMA (Federal Information Security Management Act) — U.S. federal law requiring government agencies and contractors to implement information security programs including logging and monitoring.
Log — A time-stamped record of an event generated by a system, application, or device (e.g., "User X logged in at 14:32:07 from IP 192.168.1.10").
MITRE ATT&CK — A knowledge base of adversary tactics and techniques based on real-world observations, maintained by the MITRE Corporation. Used to classify and evaluate security detections.
MSSP (Managed Security Service Provider) — A third-party company that manages and monitors an organization's security infrastructure and tools, including SIEM.
NIS2 (Network and Information Security Directive 2) — EU directive effective October 2024 requiring operators of essential and important entities to implement cybersecurity risk management measures and report incidents.
Normalization — The process of converting log data from different sources into a common format so it can be searched and compared consistently.
SIEM (Security Information and Event Management) — A platform that aggregates security data from across an organization's IT environment, correlates it in real time, and surfaces threats and compliance reports from a single interface.
SIM (Security Information Management) — The precursor to SIEM focused on long-term log storage, analysis, and reporting.
SOAR (Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response) — Technology that automates incident response actions based on predefined playbooks triggered by SIEM alerts.
SOC (Security Operations Center) — The team of security analysts and their associated processes and technologies responsible for monitoring, detecting, and responding to cyber threats.
SEM (Security Event Management) — The precursor to SIEM focused on real-time event monitoring and alerting.
Threat intelligence — Information about known or emerging threats — malicious IP addresses, file hashes, attacker techniques — used to enrich and contextualize security alerts.
UEBA (User and Entity Behavior Analytics) — A SIEM capability that uses machine learning to build behavioral baselines and detect anomalous behavior by users and devices.
XDR (Extended Detection and Response) — A security architecture that unifies detection and response across endpoints, network, email, and cloud in a single platform, typically within a single vendor's ecosystem.
18. Sources and References
IBM Security. "Cost of a Data Breach Report 2024." IBM / Ponemon Institute. July 30, 2024. https://newsroom.ibm.com/2024-07-30-ibm-report-escalating-data-breach-disruption-pushes-costs-to-new-highs
IBM. "Surging Data Breach Disruption Drives Costs to Record Highs." IBM Think. July 30, 2024. https://www.ibm.com/think/insights/whats-new-2024-cost-of-a-data-breach-report
Mordor Intelligence. "Security Information and Event Management Market Size & Growth Report, 2030." June 2025. https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/global-security-information-and-event-management
Grand View Research. "Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Market Report, 2033." November 2025. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/security-information-event-management-market-report
Kings Research. "Security Information & Event Management (SIEM) Market Size 2032." November 2025. https://www.kingsresearch.com/report/security-information-and-event-management-market-2865
Polaris Market Research. "Managed SIEM Services Market Demand & Forecast 2024–2032." 2025. https://www.polarismarketresearch.com/industry-analysis/managed-siem-services-market
Verified Market Research. "Security Information And Event Management Market Size & Forecast." December 2025. https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/product/security-information-and-event-management-market/
IMARC Group. "Security Information Event Management Market." 2025. https://www.imarcgroup.com/security-information-event-management-market
TechTarget. "The History, Evolution and Current State of SIEM." 2024. https://www.techtarget.com/searchsecurity/tip/The-history-evolution-and-current-state-of-SIEM
Wikipedia. "Security Information and Event Management." Updated October 2025. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security_information_and_event_management
Wikipedia. "2017 Equifax Data Breach." Updated December 2025. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Equifax_data_breach
U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. "The Equifax Data Breach." December 2018. https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Equifax-Report.pdf
Breachsense. "Equifax Data Breach: A Case Study." 2025. https://www.breachsense.com/blog/equifax-data-breach/
Breachsense. "Target Data Breach Case Study: Timeline, Costs & Lessons." February 2026. https://www.breachsense.com/blog/target-data-breach/
Huntress. "Target Data Breach: What Happened, Impact, and Lessons." 2025. https://www.huntress.com/threat-library/data-breach/target-data-breach
Portnox. "Throwback to the Target Hack: How It Happened, and Lessons Learned." October 2025. https://www.portnox.com/blog/cyber-attacks/throwback-to-the-target-hack/
Framework Security. "The Target Breach: A Historic Cyberattack with Lasting Consequences." October 2024. https://frameworksecurity.com/post/the-target-breach-a-historic-cyberattack-with-lasting-consequences
CSO Online / Jon Oltsik. "Lessons Learned from the Target Breach." March 2014. https://www.csoonline.com/article/546524/lessons-learned-from-the-target-breach.html
Stellar Cyber. "Top SIEM Compliance Use Cases: GDPR, PCI DSS, ISO, and More." December 2025. https://stellarcyber.ai/learn/siem-compliance-use-cases/
Infosys Blogs. "Data Breaches in 2024: Trends and Case Studies." 2024. https://blogs.infosys.com/emerging-technology-solutions/datanext/data-breaches-in-2024-trends-and-case-studies.html
NIST. "SIEM Definition." NIST Computer Security Resource Center. https://csrc.nist.gov (ongoing)
Exabeam. "SIEM Use Cases in a Modern Threat Landscape." November 2024. https://www.exabeam.com/explainers/siem-security/siem-use-cases/
Palo Alto Networks. "What Are SIEM Use Cases?" Cyberpedia. https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/cyberpedia/what-are-siem-use-cases
Redscan. "What Is a Next-Gen SIEM?" August 2024. https://www.redscan.com/news/what-is-a-next-gen-siem/
SkyQuestTT. "Global Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Market." 2025. https://www.skyquestt.com/report/security-information-and-event-management-market
$50
Product Title
Product Details goes here with the simple product description and more information can be seen by clicking the see more button. Product Details goes here with the simple product description and more information can be seen by clicking the see more button
$50
Product Title
Product Details goes here with the simple product description and more information can be seen by clicking the see more button. Product Details goes here with the simple product description and more information can be seen by clicking the see more button.
$50
Product Title
Product Details goes here with the simple product description and more information can be seen by clicking the see more button. Product Details goes here with the simple product description and more information can be seen by clicking the see more button.
Comments