Machine Learning Platforms Comparison: Azure AI vs AWS SageMaker vs Google Vertex AI
- Muiz As-Siddeeqi
- Oct 10
- 16 min read
Machine Learning Platforms Comparison: Azure AI vs AWS SageMaker vs Google Vertex AI
The $50,000 Question Nobody Talks About
You're staring at three names—AWS SageMaker, Azure ML, Google Vertex AI. All promise powerful machine learning. All claim they're "the best." Your CTO wants a decision by Friday, and honestly? They all look identical in the marketing brochures.
Here's what nobody tells you: picking the wrong ML platform can quietly drain $50,000+ annually through hidden costs, team friction, and migration nightmares. According to a 2025 Medium analysis on MLOps platforms, "the real challenge begins when trying to reliably deploy, scale, and maintain" ML models in production, and as one practitioner put it, trying to choose feels "like standing in a grocery store aisle staring at a hundred different kinds of olive oil".
The truth? This decision isn't about feature checklists. It's about where your data lives, what your team already knows, and whether you're willing to bet your ML roadmap on one cloud provider for the next three years.
We spent 10+ hours analyzing official documentation, independent reviews, and real pricing to cut through the noise. No fluff. No vendor bias. Just the facts you need to choose confidently—whether you're launching your first model or scaling to production.
Which Machine Learning Platform Should I Choose?
Quick Answer: Your existing cloud infrastructure determines 80% of this decision.
Choose AWS SageMaker if: You're already on AWS. It offers 60+ instance types, the strongest MLOps tooling, and Savings Plans up to 64% off. Best for complex enterprise ML at scale. Market leader with 34% share.
Choose Azure ML if: You use Microsoft 365, Teams, or Power BI. It provides drag-and-drop Designer, no platform fees (pay only for VMs), and confidential computing for regulated industries. Holds 29% market share.
Choose Google Vertex AI if: You're on Google Cloud or need BigQuery integration. It has the cleanest UI, TPU v5p hardware, and $300 free credits. Best for data analytics and NLP. Holds 22% market share.
All three cost $0.05-0.10/hour for entry-level instances. Migration costs between clouds often exceed feature advantages. Start with your current cloud platform unless you have compelling reasons to switch.
Table of Contents
TL;DR — Quick Picks
Why: Deep integration with AWS services, comprehensive MLOps tools, powerful AutoML.
Top specs: 60+ instance types, Inferentia3 chips for cost savings, 99.9% uptime SLA.
Best for: Enterprise teams already on AWS infrastructure needing end-to-end ML workflows.
Pricing: Pay-as-you-go from $0.05/hour (ml.t3.medium); Savings Plans up to 64% off.→ Check pricing at AWS
Why: Seamless Office/Teams integration, drag-and-drop designer, strong enterprise governance.
Top specs: Visual Designer, AutoML for time-series, Confidential ML with Intel SGX v4.
Best for: Organizations using Microsoft ecosystem wanting balanced simplicity and flexibility.
Pricing: No platform fee—pay only for compute (VMs from ~$0.10/hour); Reserved Instances save up to 72%.→ Check pricing at Azure
Why: Cleanest UI, excellent AutoML, native BigQuery integration, cutting-edge AI research.
Top specs: TPU v5p for training, Gemini model access, unified ML platform (launched 2021).
Best for: Data-heavy projects needing analytics integration and rapid experimentation.
Pricing: Pay-as-you-go from ~$0.045/vCPU-hour; $300 free credits for 90 days (new users); 30-second billing increments.→ Check pricing at Google Cloud
Comparison Table
Feature | |||
Launched | 2017 | 2018 (preview 2014) | 2021 |
Best For | AWS-native orgs, complex ML | Microsoft shops, visual workflows | Google Cloud users, NLP/analytics |
Starting Price | $0.05/hour (ml.t3.medium) | VM-based (~$0.10/hour) | ~$0.045/vCPU-hour |
Free Tier | 250 hours/month (2 months) | None (Azure Free Trial) | $300 credits (90 days) |
AutoML | SageMaker Autopilot | Azure AutoML | Vertex AI AutoML |
Visual Interface | SageMaker Studio, Canvas | Designer (drag-and-drop) | Vertex AI Workbench |
Model Training | 60+ instance types, Spot VMs | Azure VMs, GPU support | TPU v5p, Spot VMs |
Model Deployment | Real-time, batch, serverless | Real-time, batch | Real-time, batch |
MLOps | SageMaker Pipelines, Model Monitor | MLflow integration, Azure ML Pipelines | Vertex AI Pipelines |
Key Integration | AWS services (S3, Lambda, etc.) | Microsoft 365, Power BI, Teams | BigQuery, Google Workspace |
Specialized Hardware | Inferentia3, Trainium | Intel SGX v4 (confidential ML) | TPU v5p, A100 GPUs |
Documentation Quality | Extensive | Comprehensive | Good (improving) |
Learning Curve | Moderate-steep | Moderate | Moderate |
Market Share (2025) | ~34% | ~29% | ~22% |
Support | AWS Support plans | Azure Support plans | Google Cloud Support |
How to read this table:
Starting price reflects the cheapest compute option for testing/light workloads. Production costs vary widely based on instance type and usage.
Market share data from Ankur Tyagi newsletter, February 2025.
Free tier details apply to new accounts; always verify current offers on official sites.
All pricing checked October 10, 2025—subject to change.
Why Trust This Comparison
We conducted 10+ hours of research across official documentation, independent analyst reports, and technical reviews to create this comparison. Our methodology:
Data Sources:
Official pricing pages from AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud (accessed October 2025)
Technical analysis from TechTarget, CloudExpat, and industry publications
Market data from research firms monitoring cloud ML platforms
User reviews from PeerSpot, TrustRadius, and G2 (verified reviews)
What We Analyzed:
Pricing structures and cost models
Feature sets and capabilities
Integration ecosystems
Performance benchmarks from independent sources
User feedback from verified enterprise deployments
Transparency:
We did not conduct hands-on testing of these platforms
All claims are backed by cited sources with publication dates
Pricing information verified October 10, 2025
We acknowledge affiliate relationships where they exist
Update Policy: We review this comparison quarterly and update pricing/features as platforms evolve. Major changes trigger immediate updates.
In-Depth Reviews
What it is: Launched in 2017, Amazon SageMaker is AWS's comprehensive machine learning service designed for building, training, and deploying ML models. It provides an end-to-end platform integrated deeply with the AWS ecosystem.
Why it stands out: SageMaker excels in providing a wide range of built-in algorithms and tight integration with the AWS ecosystem, with strengths in end-to-end capabilities and robust MLOps features. AWS maintains its lead through Inferentia3 optimizations, while the platform now includes HyperPod for training 100B+ parameter models with automatic fault recovery achieving 99.9% uptime during 6-week training cycles.
Key Specs & Performance:
Instance Types: Over 60 instance types ranging from ml.t3.medium at $0.05/hour to high-performance GPU instances
AutoML: SageMaker Autopilot automates data preprocessing, feature engineering, model selection, and hyperparameter optimization, supporting tabular data, text classification, image classification, and time-series forecasting
Deployment Options: Real-time endpoints, batch transform, serverless inference, and multi-model endpoints
Cost Optimization: Savings Plans offer up to 64% off On-Demand pricing with 1- or 3-year commitments
Who it's for:
Enterprise teams deeply invested in AWS infrastructure
Organizations needing comprehensive MLOps and model governance
Teams building complex, production-scale ML systems
Companies requiring extensive built-in algorithms and frameworks
Not for:
Small teams seeking simple, quick-start solutions
Organizations without AWS expertise
Budget-conscious startups (can get expensive at scale)
Teams prioritizing visual, no-code workflows over flexibility
Common Gripes: Users find that SageMaker notebooks are not accessible across regions, making it uncomfortable when expensive GPU servers are accidentally launched in the wrong region. Idle instances are billed per hour, and forgetting to close notebooks can add up costs significantly.
Alternatives: If SageMaker feels too complex or expensive, consider Azure ML for more user-friendly interfaces or Google Vertex AI for simpler data integration with analytics tools.
Pricing:
Training: ml.t3.medium costs around $0.05/hour; ml.m5.xlarge costs $0.23/hour
Inference: ml.g5.xlarge costs approximately $1.212/hour in US West (Oregon)
SageMaker Canvas: $1.90 per hour of active session usage
Free Tier: 250 hours on ml.t3.medium or ml.t2.medium instances, 50 hours of training, 125 hours real-time inference for first 2 months
What it is: Azure Machine Learning debuted as a preview in 2014 and became generally available in 2018, designed for developing and running AI models on Microsoft Azure cloud. It offers a perfect balance between flexibility for data scientists and simplicity for business users.
Why it stands out: Standout features include a drag-and-drop UI that caters to less experienced data scientists, and project templates that help automate the provisioning of ML projects. Azure dominates regulated industries with confidential computing, and the 2025 architecture ships Unified AI Studio, merging generative AI workflows with traditional predictive modeling.
Key Specs & Performance:
Visual Designer: No-code drag-and-drop interface for building ML pipelines
AutoML: AutoML for time series gets a 2025 boost with multi-horizon forecasting, slashing energy grid prediction errors by 32% using BigQuery-integrated pipelines
Security: Confidential ML leverages Intel SGX v4 to encrypt model weights during training, achieving 98% accuracy on encrypted health data trials
Integration: Native integration with Microsoft 365, Teams, Power BI, and Azure services
Deployment: Supports real-time endpoints, batch scoring, and Azure Kubernetes Service
Who it's for:
Organizations already using Microsoft ecosystem (Office, Teams, Power BI)
Teams wanting both no-code and code-first approaches
Regulated industries requiring confidential computing
Data analysts transitioning to ML without deep coding expertise
Not for:
Teams already heavily invested in AWS or GCP
Organizations needing cutting-edge AI research models
Projects requiring the absolute lowest compute costs
Teams without any Azure Cloud familiarity
Common Gripes: Users note the cost is mid-tier and not all features are available in the trial version; prior knowledge is required as it's not a pure no-code solution. The UI can be made more simple as searching features can be difficult sometimes.
Alternatives: If Azure ML doesn't fit, consider Google Vertex AI for better UI/UX or SageMaker for tighter MLOps.
Pricing: There is no additional charge to use Azure Machine Learning itself—you pay only for underlying compute resources like Azure VMs. Example costs:
Training: 10 DS14 v2 VMs (16 cores each) at $1.196/machine-hour for 100 hours = $1,196
Deployment: Same setup running 24/7 for 30 days = $8,611.20
Discounts: Reserved VM Instances provide significant cost reduction when committing to 1- or 3-year terms
What it is: Released in 2021, Google Vertex AI is the newest ML platform in this comparison, unifying Google's previous AI Platform and AutoML services. It offers advanced ML tools with deep integration into Google Cloud's data and analytics ecosystem.
Why it stands out: Vertex AI is arguably the most feature-rich ML platform, offering advanced ML tools and customization options, including a wide range of foundation models and prebuilt extensions. Google's data offering has more advanced tools, and they integrate well with Vertex AI and BigQuery, one of the leading data warehouses. GCP punches above its weight in AI research, leveraging TPU v5p clusters and BigQuery's petabyte-scale analytics.
Key Specs & Performance:
Training Hardware: A100 GPUs at $2.93/hour; TPU v5p for cutting-edge performance
AutoML: Comprehensive AutoML for tabular, image, video, and text data
Foundation Models: Access to Gemini model family for text-to-image, code generation, and multi-modal reasoning
Data Integration: Seamless integration with BigQuery for analytics at petabyte scale
Billing: Usage billed in 30-second increments for training and prediction
Who it's for:
Organizations already using Google Cloud Platform
Data-heavy projects requiring tight analytics integration
Teams prioritizing UI/UX and rapid experimentation
NLP and computer vision projects leveraging Google's AI research
Not for:
Organizations with no Google Cloud presence
Teams requiring the deepest MLOps maturity (SageMaker leads here)
Projects needing extensive hands-on support documentation
Budget-sensitive projects (can be expensive for long-running workloads)
Common Gripes: Some users find Vertex AI's documentation lacking, which can be a hurdle for those new to Google Cloud services. Users note pricing for tokens can be expensive, and Vertex AI Search isn't bulletproof.
Alternatives: If Vertex AI doesn't fit, consider SageMaker for broader algorithm selection or Azure ML for better enterprise governance.
Pricing:
Training: AutoML models cost $3.465 per node hour; custom-trained models cost $0.218499 per hour
Workbench: Vertex AI Workbench costs $0.045564 per vCPU/hour
Storage: Persistent disk storage ranges from $0.048 per GB per month for standard to $0.204 for SSD
Free Credits: New customers receive $300 in free credits to explore Vertex AI services over 90 days
No Minimum: No minimum usage requirements; billing in 30-second increments
Buyer's Guide
Key Decision Factors
Existing Infrastructure Platform choice depends heavily on existing infrastructure, with Azure best for Microsoft shops, Vertex for Google Cloud users, and SageMaker for AWS-native organizations. Switching cloud providers adds significant migration costs and operational complexity.
Team Expertise
Heavy AWS experience? SageMaker is the natural fit
Microsoft ecosystem users? Azure ML integrates seamlessly
Data science teams wanting clean UI? Vertex AI has a clear advantage in user experience
Use Case Alignment
Complex MLOps: SageMaker excels with comprehensive MLOps capabilities
Visual workflows: Azure ML's Designer offers flexible no-code building
NLP/Analytics: Vertex AI leverages Google's AI research strength
Budget & Pricing Model All three use pay-as-you-go pricing, but:
AWS offers Savings Plans up to 64% off
Azure has Reserved Instances for long-term discounts
Google offers Committed Use Discounts up to 55% off
What to Avoid
Common Pitfalls:
Idle resource costs: Forgetting to shut down instances in SageMaker can rack up unexpected bills
Region confusion: SageMaker notebooks aren't globally accessible; launching expensive resources in wrong regions creates issues
Token pricing surprise: Vertex AI's token-based pricing for generative AI can be hard to forecast without clear usage patterns
Red Flags:
Platforms promising "completely free" production ML—compute always costs money
Claims of one platform being "10x better"—choice depends on your specific context
Ignoring data transfer costs between cloud regions
Care & Cost Optimization
For SageMaker:
Set idle shutdown timers and specify 0 as minimum nodes for compute clusters
Use Spot instances for non-critical training jobs (up to 90% savings)
Monitor usage with automated alerts to prevent idle resource leaks
For Azure ML:
Use low-priority compute resources during training tasks if deadlines allow
Don't pick too low a compute tier—slower processing costs more long-term
Leverage Azure Cost Management for real-time spend tracking
For Vertex AI:
Use Spot VMs for batch training (up to 80% savings)
Enable auto-scaling to eliminate idle compute costs
Opt for Committed Use Discounts for predictable workloads (up to 55% off)
Pricing Deep Dive
Side-by-Side Cost Example
Scenario: Training a medium-complexity ML model on 100GB dataset for 150 hours, then deploying for real-time inference
AWS SageMaker:
Using ml.m5.xlarge ($0.23/hour) for 150 hours = $34.50 training costInference on ml.m5.large ($0.115/hour) running 24/7 for 30 days = $82.80/monthS3 storage (100GB): ~$2.30/month
Total first month: ~$119.60
Azure ML:
Similar setup would cost based on VM selection; compute charges are based on instance hours usedComparable instance ~$0.20/hour for 150 hours = $30 trainingInference on similar VM 24/7: ~$144/monthStorage: ~$2.50/month
Total first month: ~$176.50
Google Vertex AI:
Custom-trained models at $0.218499/hour for 150 hours = $32.77 trainingInference pricing varies by configurationStorage (100GB): ~$4.80/month
Total first month: ~$125-150 (estimate)
Important Notes:
Prices checked October 10, 2025—always verify current rates
Actual costs vary significantly based on instance types, regions, and usage patterns
All platforms offer discounts for committed usage
Data transfer and storage costs add to base compute charges
Hidden Costs to Watch
Data Egress: Moving data out of cloud regions incurs charges (typically $0.08-0.12/GB)
Model Storage: Storing trained models and artifacts in cloud storage
Monitoring Services: Tools like SageMaker Model Monitor or Azure Monitor add costs
API Calls: High-volume inference requests can accumulate significant charges
Support Plans: Premium support ranges from hundreds to thousands monthly
Case Studies
Case Study 1: AES Renewable Energy (Vertex AI)
Challenge:
AES, one of the world's largest renewable power producers, conducted 1,500 annual safety audits, each consuming over 100 person-hours across document review and compliance checks.
Solution:
AES combined Vertex AI with Anthropic's Claude model using the Model Garden, enabling a single instance to perform what previously required dozens of staff.
Results:
Dramatically reduced audit time while maintaining accuracy requirements, allowing the company to scale audits across expanding wind and solar farm portfolios.
Source: Pump.co Vertex AI Pricing Analysis
Case Study 2: SuccessKPI (SageMaker Canvas)
Challenge:
Contact center needed to assess agent-customer conversations at scale without extensive manual review.
Solution:
SuccessKPI used SageMaker Canvas to fine-tune Foundation Models using historical question-answer pairs, automating conversation scoring.
Results:
Significantly enhanced operational efficiency and improved overall quality of contact center interactions.
Case Study 3: Deloitte Consulting (Multiple Platforms)
Challenge:
Large-scale consulting engagements requiring rapid ML development and deployment.
Solution:
Through AWS's no-code ML services such as SageMaker Canvas and SageMaker Data Wrangler, Deloitte unlocked new efficiencies.
Results:
Enhanced speed of development and deployment productivity by 30-40% across client-facing ML projects.
FAQs
Q: Which platform is cheapest for small projects?
A: AWS SageMaker offers the lowest entry point at $0.05/hour for ml.t3.medium instances, but Google Vertex AI provides $300 in free credits for 90 days for new users, which may offer better value initially.
Q: Can I switch between platforms later?
A: Yes, but migration is non-trivial. Models trained on one platform need retraining or conversion. Platform choice depends heavily on existing infrastructure, as switching adds significant migration costs.
Q: Do I need coding skills for all three?
A: Azure ML offers the most accessible no-code experience with its Designer interface, followed by SageMaker Canvas for business analysts. Vertex AI has AutoML but generally expects more technical familiarity.
Q: Which has the best AutoML capabilities?
A: All three offer strong AutoML, but Vertex AI is arguably the most feature-rich. SageMaker Autopilot supports tabular, text, image classification, and time-series forecasting.
Q: What about GPU availability and pricing?
A: Google Vertex AI offers A100 GPUs at $2.93/hour. AWS and Azure have similar GPU options with varying availability. All three offer Spot/preemptible instances for cost savings.
Q: Which platform handles big data best?
A: Google Vertex AI integrates seamlessly with BigQuery for petabyte-scale analytics. AWS SageMaker connects well with data lakes and Redshift. Azure ML integrates with Azure Synapse Analytics.
Q: Are there lock-in concerns?
A: Yes. Deep integration with each cloud's services creates some lock-in. Using open frameworks (TensorFlow, PyTorch) and containerization reduces this risk.
Q: Which has the best documentation?
A: AWS SageMaker has the most extensive documentation. Some users find Vertex AI's documentation lacking compared to competitors.
Q: Can these platforms handle regulated industries?
A: Yes. Azure ML dominates regulated industries with confidential computing using Intel SGX v4. All three offer compliance certifications (HIPAA, SOC 2, GDPR).
Q: What about model monitoring and drift detection?
A: All three platforms offer monitoring. SageMaker Model Monitor, Azure ML Model Monitor, and Vertex AI Model Monitoring all detect data/concept drift and performance degradation.
Q: Which platform is best for NLP tasks?
A: Google Vertex AI leverages Google's AI research strengths in NLP. Access to Gemini models provides cutting-edge capabilities for text generation and understanding.
Q: Do these platforms support multi-cloud deployments?
A: For multi-cloud strategies, Vertex AI's BigQuery Omni analyzes cross-cloud data without migration, while Azure ML's Confidential AI protects workloads across hybrid environments.
Q: What's the learning curve like for each?
A: Vertex AI's learning curve can be steeper; users with limited ML experience might find it challenging. Azure ML aims for simplicity and quick results. SageMaker sits in the middle with extensive features requiring time to master.
Q: Which offers the best model explainability?
A: SageMaker Autopilot automatically generates notebooks showing how models were created. All three platforms support explainability tools like SHAP.
Q: Can I use my own ML frameworks?
A: Yes. All three support TensorFlow, PyTorch, Scikit-learn, and other popular frameworks. SageMaker and Vertex AI also support custom container images.
Q: What about edge deployment capabilities?
A: Azure ML offers strong IoT and edge deployment capabilities. AWS has SageMaker Edge Manager. Google has Edge TPU for on-device inference.
Q: Which platform has the best performance for LLM fine-tuning?
A: SageMaker's Inferentia3 chips slash LLM inference costs by 58%. Vertex AI's TPU v5p clusters excel for large-scale training.
Q: Are there regional availability differences?
A: Yes. AWS has the broadest global infrastructure. Azure and Google Cloud are expanding but have fewer regions. Always check region availability for specific services.
Q: Can these platforms handle computer vision tasks?
A: Yes. All three platforms proficiently handle object detection, face detection, and text recognition. Google Vertex AI uniquely offers logo detection and search for similar images on the web.
Q: What about batch prediction capabilities?
A: SageMaker Autopilot supports batch transform for processing large datasets. Azure ML and Vertex AI offer similar batch scoring capabilities.
Q: Which platform updates features most frequently?
A: As of 2023, gaps get closed regularly as platforms compete. All three rapidly add features, particularly around generative AI capabilities.
Final Verdict
Choose AWS SageMaker if:
You're already deep in the AWS ecosystem
You need the most comprehensive MLOps tooling
Your team has AWS expertise and doesn't mind a steeper learning curve
You prefer stronger integration capabilities within the AWS ecosystem
You want brute-force solutions for petascale AI with specialized hardware like Inferentia3
Bottom line: SageMaker is the enterprise workhorse—powerful, comprehensive, but demanding technical expertise.
Choose Azure Machine Learning if:
You're already using Microsoft 365, Teams, or Power BI
You want a balanced platform serving both analysts and data scientists
You need simplicity, governance, and quick results
Your industry requires confidential computing for sensitive data
You prefer a drag-and-drop designer for visual workflows
Bottom line: Azure ML offers the sweet spot between ease of use and advanced capabilities, especially for Microsoft-centric organizations.
Choose Google Vertex AI if:
You're invested in Google Cloud Platform
You need advanced data tools that integrate well with BigQuery
Your projects focus on NLP, analytics, or cutting-edge AI research
You value superior user experience and clean UI
You're building AI-research-heavy applications leveraging Google's expertise
Bottom line: Vertex AI is the modern, research-forward choice with the cleanest interface and strongest data analytics integration.
The Universal Truth:
Platform choice depends heavily on existing infrastructure. Don't choose based on features alone—consider:
Where your data lives
What tools your team already knows
Your existing cloud commitments
Long-term strategic cloud direction
Our recommendation: Start with a proof-of-concept on your current cloud platform. Migration costs often exceed any feature advantages, especially for established organizations.
Sources
Official Documentation
AWS SageMaker Pricing - Amazon Web Services - https://aws.amazon.com/sagemaker/pricing/ - Updated weekly (accessed October 10, 2025)
Azure Machine Learning Pricing - Microsoft Azure - https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/details/machine-learning/ - Official pricing page
Vertex AI Pricing - Google Cloud - https://cloud.google.com/vertex-ai/pricing - Official pricing page
SageMaker Autopilot Documentation - AWS - https://docs.aws.amazon.com/sagemaker/latest/dg/autopilot-automate-model-development.html - Technical documentation
AWS SageMaker AI Pricing Details - AWS - https://aws.amazon.com/sagemaker/ai/pricing/ - Updated October 6, 2025
Independent Analysis & Reviews
"Compare Google Vertex AI vs. Amazon SageMaker vs. Azure ML" - TechTarget - March 13, 2025 - https://www.techtarget.com/searchenterpriseai/tip/Compare-Google-Vertex-AI-vs-Amazon-SageMaker-vs-Azure-ML
"AWS SageMaker vs Google Vertex AI vs Azure ML: Cloud ML Platform Reality" - AWS in Plain English (Medium) - August 31, 2025
"SageMaker vs Azure ML vs Google AI Platform: A Comprehensive Comparison" - CloudOptimo - March 13, 2025
"Amazon SageMaker vs Google Vertex AI" - PeerSpot - July 27, 2025 - Includes user ratings and reviews
"SageMaker vs. Vertex AI: Key Strategic Considerations" - Superwise.ai - May 3, 2023
Market Research
"Azure ML vs Vertex AI vs SageMaker: A Comparison" - Ankur Tyagi Newsletter - February 13, 2025 - Market share data: AWS 34%, Azure 29%, GCP 22%
"In-Depth Comparison: AWS SageMaker, Azure ML, and GCP Vertex AI in 2024" - CloudExpat - Feature comparison across speech, text, and image processing
"Gartner Forecasts Worldwide Public Cloud End-User Spending to Total $723 Billion in 2025" - Gartner - November 19, 2024 - Cloud market growth projections
Pricing Guides & Cost Analysis
"Amazon SageMaker Pricing Guide: 2025 Costs (And Savings)" - CloudZero - August 15, 2025
"AWS SageMaker Pricing Guide - Cost Breakdown & Optimization Tips" - CloudForecast - July 28, 2025
"SageMaker costs for AI model" - AWS re:Post - March 18, 2025 - Real-world cost examples
"Amazon SageMaker AI Pricing: Detailed Breakdown and Ultimate Guide" - CloudChipr - Comprehensive pricing breakdown
"Azure Machine Learning Pricing 2025: Is it Worth It?" - TrustRadius user reviews and pricing
"Azure Machine Learning Pricing – 2024 Guide to ML Costs" - Umbrella - July 29, 2025
"Google Cloud Vertex AI Pricing Review 2025: Plans & Costs" - Tekpon - May 27, 2025
"Vertex AI Pricing Review + Features and an Alternative" - Lindy - August 8, 2025
"Google Vertex AI Pricing - Cost Breakdown & Savings Guide" - Pump.co - AES case study included
Technical Deep Dives
"Democratizing Machine Learning with AWS SageMaker AutoML" - Towards Data Science (Medium) - January 17, 2025
"AWS SageMaker alternatives: Top 6 platforms for MLOps in 2025" - Northflank Blog
"Time series forecasting with Amazon SageMaker AutoML" - AWS Machine Learning Blog - October 8, 2024
"Azure Pricing Demystified in 2025: Costs, Discounts & More" - Intercept Cloud - March 28, 2025
Comments