What are Vision Language Models (VLMs)? A Complete Guide to AI That Sees and Understands
- Muiz As-Siddeeqi
- Oct 14
- 37 min read
Picture this: a doctor uploads an X-ray to a computer. Within seconds, the AI doesn't just detect a fracture—it reads the patient's medical history, spots a subtle shadow that might be a tumor, and drafts a detailed radiology report in plain English. Or imagine a self-driving car that doesn't just "see" a stop sign—it reads the text, understands the context of a school zone, and adjusts its behavior accordingly. This isn't science fiction. It's happening right now, powered by Vision Language Models.
For decades, computers were either good at seeing (computer vision) or understanding language (natural language processing), but rarely both. Vision Language Models have shattered that barrier. By 2025, these AI systems have become the most exciting frontier in artificial intelligence, bridging the gap between visual perception and human language with stunning results.
TL;DR: Key Takeaways
Vision Language Models (VLMs) combine computer vision and natural language processing, allowing AI to understand both images and text simultaneously
Major VLMs in 2025 include OpenAI's GPT-4V, Google's Gemini 2.5 Pro, Anthropic's Claude Sonnet 4.5, and open-source models like LLaVA
The global AI market reached $638.23 billion in 2024 and is projected to hit $3,680.47 billion by 2034, with VLMs driving significant growth (Precedence Research, 2025)
Real-world applications span healthcare diagnostics, autonomous vehicles, robotics, retail automation, content moderation, and accessibility tools
VLMs excel at zero-shot learning, meaning they can recognize and describe objects they've never explicitly been trained on
Challenges include hallucinations, data scarcity, computational costs, and ethical concerns around bias and privacy
What are Vision Language Models?
Vision Language Models (VLMs) are AI systems that combine computer vision and natural language processing to understand and generate information from both visual and textual data. Unlike traditional AI that handles only images or only text, VLMs can analyze a photo, interpret its contents, and describe what they see in human language—or vice versa, understanding text instructions to perform visual tasks. These models power applications from medical diagnostics to autonomous driving.
Table of Contents
Understanding Vision Language Models: The Basics
Vision Language Models represent a fundamental shift in how artificial intelligence processes information. Unlike traditional AI systems that work in silos—either analyzing images or processing text—VLMs are multimodal systems that handle both simultaneously.
What Makes VLMs Different
Traditional computer vision models can identify objects in images. A model might tell you there's a dog in a photo. Large language models like GPT can write about dogs eloquently. But neither can bridge the gap between seeing and describing. VLMs do both.
When you show a VLM an image of a crowded street and ask, "Is it safe to cross?", the model doesn't just detect pedestrians and cars. It understands the spatial relationships, interprets traffic signals, reads street signs, and provides a contextual answer in natural language.
Core Capabilities
Vision Language Models excel at several key tasks:
Visual Question Answering (VQA): Users can ask questions about images. "What color is the car?" "How many people are in this room?" "Is there a fire extinguisher visible in this warehouse photo?" The VLM analyzes the image and responds in natural language.
Image Captioning: VLMs generate descriptive text for images, from simple labels ("a golden retriever playing in a park") to detailed reports ("The patient's chest X-ray shows bilateral pulmonary infiltrates consistent with pneumonia, with the right lower lobe more severely affected").
Optical Character Recognition (OCR): Modern VLMs can read text in images—signs, documents, handwriting—and understand it contextually. They don't just extract the words; they comprehend what those words mean in relation to the visual content.
Cross-Modal Retrieval: Given text, VLMs can find relevant images, and vice versa. A researcher searching a medical database can type "lateral meniscus tear with joint effusion" and retrieve matching MRI scans instantly.
Zero-Shot Classification: Perhaps most impressively, VLMs can recognize and classify objects they've never explicitly been trained on, simply by understanding textual descriptions of those objects.
The Technical Foundation
At their core, VLMs consist of three primary components:
Vision Encoder: Processes images and converts them into mathematical representations (embeddings)
Language Encoder/Decoder: Handles text input and output
Multimodal Fusion Layer: Bridges the vision and language components, allowing them to work together
The real magic happens in the fusion layer, where visual features and linguistic concepts meet and interact. This is where a VLM learns that the visual pattern of fur, four legs, and a wagging tail corresponds to the word "dog"—and not just the word, but the entire concept, including all the contextual knowledge about dogs embedded in human language.
According to IBM's 2025 analysis, Vision Language Models blend computer vision and natural language processing capabilities by learning to map relationships between text data and visual data such as images or videos, allowing these models to generate text from visual inputs or understand natural language prompts in the context of visual information.
How VLMs Work: Architecture and Training
Understanding how Vision Language Models function requires unpacking their sophisticated architecture and training methods.
Architecture Components
Vision Transformer (ViT) or CNN-Based Image Encoder
Early VLMs used Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) like ResNet for feature extraction from images. Modern VLMs predominantly employ Vision Transformers (ViT), which treat images more like language.
A Vision Transformer divides an image into patches—think of it like cutting a photo into a grid of squares. Each patch becomes a "token," similar to words in a sentence. The transformer then processes these patches using self-attention mechanisms, allowing it to understand which parts of the image relate to each other.
For example, when analyzing a street scene, the ViT can learn that the red octagonal shape (stop sign) is positioned above the intersection, while the pedestrian figures are located on the sidewalk—spatial relationships that matter for understanding the scene.
Language Model Component
The language component typically uses transformer architectures similar to GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) or BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers). These models have proven exceptionally good at understanding and generating human language.
The text encoder captures semantic meaning and contextual associations between words and phrases, converting them into numerical representations (embeddings) that the AI can process mathematically.
Projector/Fusion Module
This critical component translates outputs from the vision encoder into a form the language model can understand. Think of it as a translator between two different languages—the language of pixels and the language of words.
In some architectures like LLaVA (Large Language and Vision Assistant), this is a simple linear layer. In more complex systems like Claude 3 or GPT-4V, cross-attention layers allow the language model to selectively focus on relevant parts of the image when generating responses.
NVIDIA's technical documentation explains that the projector translates the output of the vision encoder into a form the LLM can understand, often interpreted as image tokens. This can be a simple linear layer or something more complex like cross-attention layers.
Training Strategies
VLMs are trained through several sophisticated methods:
Contrastive Learning (CLIP-style)
The breakthrough approach introduced by OpenAI's CLIP (Contrastive Language-Image Pretraining) in 2021 revolutionized VLM training. CLIP was trained on 400 million image-caption pairs from the internet.
The contrastive learning objective works like this: given a batch of image-text pairs, the model learns to maximize the similarity between matching pairs while minimizing similarity for non-matching pairs. If you have an image of a cat paired with the caption "a fluffy orange cat sleeping," the model learns to bring these two representations close together in mathematical space. Simultaneously, it pushes apart the cat image from unrelated captions like "a blue sports car."
This simple but powerful approach allows models to learn rich visual-linguistic representations without requiring detailed labeled datasets for every possible object or concept.
Masked Modeling
Another training technique involves masking (hiding) parts of the input and training the model to predict what's missing. In masked language modeling, the VLM learns to fill in missing words in a text caption given an unmasked image. In masked image modeling, the model reconstructs hidden pixels in an image given an unmasked caption.
FLAVA (Foundational Language And Vision Alignment), for example, employs both masked language and masked image modeling using transformer architectures for both vision and language components, according to IBM research published in February 2025.
Supervised Fine-Tuning
After pre-training on massive datasets, VLMs undergo supervised fine-tuning with curated instruction-response pairs. This teaches the model how to respond appropriately to user prompts.
For instance, the training data might include:
Prompt: "Describe this medical image in detail"
Expected response: "The chest X-ray shows a large left-sided pleural effusion with blunting of the costophrenic angle..."
This fine-tuning phase is crucial for aligning the model's behavior with human expectations and use cases.
Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF)
Some cutting-edge VLMs like GPT-4V use RLHF, where human evaluators rate model outputs, and the model learns to maximize these human preference scores. This helps ensure responses are helpful, accurate, and aligned with human values.
Training Data Scale
The scale of training data matters enormously. CLIP trained on 400 million image-text pairs. Gemini 1.5 Pro was trained on an even larger corpus including text, images, video, and audio data. According to Hugging Face's 2025 VLM update, modern VLMs are increasingly trained on video data as well, with models processing thousands of frames to understand temporal dynamics and motion.
This massive scale enables VLMs to learn incredibly diverse visual concepts and their linguistic representations, from everyday objects to specialized technical terminology across dozens of domains.
Evolution and History of VLMs
Early Foundations (Pre-2020)
The roots of Vision Language Models trace back to earlier efforts in multimodal learning, though these early systems were far more limited.
2016: Natural Language Supervision Experiments
Researchers at Facebook AI Research (FAIR), including Ang Li and colleagues, demonstrated in 2016 that natural language supervision could enable zero-shot transfer to computer vision classification datasets. They fine-tuned an ImageNet CNN to predict visual concepts from Flickr photo descriptions, achieving 11.5% accuracy on ImageNet zero-shot—modest by today's standards but groundbreaking at the time, as noted in OpenAI's CLIP research documentation.
2018-2019: Early Multimodal Transformers
BERT and transformer architectures revolutionized NLP in 2018. Researchers quickly began exploring how to extend transformers to handle both vision and language. Models like VideoBERT and VisualBERT emerged, though they were limited in scale and capability.
The CLIP Revolution (2021)
February 26, 2021 marked a watershed moment when OpenAI released CLIP (Contrastive Language-Image Pretraining). Unlike previous approaches that required carefully annotated datasets, CLIP learned from 400 million naturally occurring image-caption pairs found on the internet.
CLIP demonstrated remarkable zero-shot capabilities, matching the performance of supervised models on ImageNet without ever being explicitly trained on ImageNet data. This was revolutionary—it meant the model could recognize objects it had never seen during training, simply by understanding textual descriptions.
The model was trained using a dual-encoder architecture: one Vision Transformer or ResNet for images, and one Transformer for text. The largest ResNet model (RN50x64) took 18 days to train on 592 V100 GPUs, while the largest Vision Transformer required 12 days on 256 V100 GPUs, according to Wikipedia's documentation of CLIP architecture.
CLIP became the foundation for countless downstream applications, from DALL-E's text-to-image generation to modern VLM systems that build upon its contrastive learning approach.
The LLaVA Era (2023-2024)
In April 2023, researchers introduced LLaVA (Large Language and Vision Assistant), which became the first successful and easily reproducible open-source vision language model, as noted by Hugging Face. LLaVA combined CLIP's visual encoder with a large language model (LLM), connected via a simple projection layer.
What made LLaVA significant wasn't just its architecture but its accessibility. Open-source researchers could finally build, evaluate, and fine-tune VLMs without massive computational resources.
Microsoft's LLaVA-Med, a medical variant, demonstrated how VLMs could be specialized for domain-specific applications. It was fine-tuned on biomedical image-text pairs from PubMed Central, enabling interpretation of medical imagery across multiple modalities.
The Commercial Breakthrough (Late 2023-2024)
September 2023: OpenAI launched GPT-4V (GPT-4 with Vision), bringing multimodal capabilities to the mainstream through ChatGPT. Suddenly, millions of users could upload images and have conversations about them.
December 2023: Google announced Gemini, designed from the ground up as a natively multimodal model rather than separate vision and language systems bolted together. Gemini was trained on text, images, video, audio, and code simultaneously.
March 2024: Anthropic released Claude 3 (Opus, Sonnet, Haiku), with vision capabilities that surpassed previous benchmarks on tasks like interpreting charts and graphs.
According to comparison analyses from DataCamp (July 2025), GPT-4V distinguished itself with precision and succinctness in responses, while Gemini excelled in providing detailed, expansive answers with relevant imagery. Claude 3 showed particularly strong performance in document understanding and reasoning tasks.
The Current Landscape (2025)
By 2025, VLMs have entered a phase of rapid specialization and capability expansion:
Reasoning Models: Gemini 2.5 Pro and Claude Sonnet 4.5 feature "thinking-model" architectures that perform step-by-step reasoning before responding. This dramatically improves performance on complex visual reasoning tasks.
Video Understanding: Models now process hours of video content, understanding motion, temporal relationships, and event sequences. Qwen2.5-VL uses 3D convolutional layers to aggregate information from multiple video frames efficiently.
Edge Deployment: Smaller models optimized for mobile devices and edge computing are emerging. SmolVLA, released by Hugging Face with just 450 million parameters, demonstrates that VLM capabilities can run locally on resource-constrained devices.
Multimodal Agents: VLMs are evolving beyond passive analysis to active agents that can interact with software, control robots, and make decisions. Hugging Face's smolagents library, introduced in early 2025, enables developers to build agentic workflows where VLMs dynamically retrieve and analyze images to accomplish complex tasks.
Major Vision Language Models
The VLM landscape in 2025 is dominated by both proprietary and open-source models, each with distinct strengths.
Proprietary Models
Google Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro stands out as Google's most advanced multimodal model. Announced in June 2025, it features:
1 million token context window (with 2 million coming soon), allowing processing of extensive documents, long videos, and large image collections in a single query
Native multimodal design trained from the start on text, images, video, and audio—not separate systems merged later
"Thinking-model" architecture that reasons step-by-step before responding
63.8% score on SWE-bench Verified, a software engineering benchmark (though trailing Claude's 70.3%)
Gemini integrates seamlessly with Google Workspace, making it powerful for productivity applications. However, users report it sometimes struggles with conversational nuance compared to competitors, according to Shadow Blog's comparative analysis (2025).
Pricing is among the most cost-effective for long-context tasks, with Gemini 1.5 Flash costing just $0.35 per million tokens.
OpenAI GPT-4.5 (o-series)
The evolution of GPT-4V through 2024 led to the o-series reasoning models and GPT-4.5 in early 2025. Key features include:
Strong all-round performance across coding, reasoning, conversation, and visual understanding
Extensive developer tools and integrations, making it the most widely adopted in commercial applications
~54.6% on SWE-Bench for code generation
Voice and image capabilities through ChatGPT's interface
GPT-4.5 remains the "jack of all trades" model—reliable for most applications but not always the best specialist. It's particularly strong for instruction-following and generating clean, well-formatted code, notes Fello AI's comprehensive 2025 comparison.
The model supports vision through image uploads in ChatGPT and via API, though it doesn't handle video or audio inputs as natively as Gemini.
Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.5
Claude Sonnet 4.5, the latest iteration released in 2025, leads in several critical areas:
70.3% on SWE-bench Verified, the highest among commercial models
Superior multi-step reasoning and document handling
Emotionally intelligent, upbeat tone praised by users
Strong safety and alignment focus, with reduced hallucination rates
Claude's vision capabilities were enhanced significantly from Claude 3 to 3.5 Sonnet, with improvements in interpreting graphs, extracting text from images, and spatial reasoning. By Claude 4/Sonnet 4.5, the model excels at technical document analysis and complex visual reasoning tasks.
Limitations include potentially higher costs compared to alternatives and less native integration with consumer tools compared to Google or OpenAI, though its API is widely supported.
Open-Source Models
LLaVA (Multiple Versions)
LLaVA remains the most influential open-source VLM series. The architecture combines:
CLIP or similar vision encoder (often SigLIP or DINOv2)
Simple linear projection layer
Open-source LLM backbone (Llama, Vicuna, etc.)
LLaVA's success lies in its reproducibility and accessibility. Researchers can train variants on consumer GPUs using LoRA (Low-Rank Adaptation) fine-tuning, dramatically reducing costs. The model demonstrates strong generalization for manipulation tasks and language grounding, outperforming from-scratch imitation learning methods by 20.4% according to OpenVLA research (June 2024).
Qwen2.5-VL
Developed by Alibaba's Qwen team, Qwen2.5-VL introduced innovations in video processing:
3D convolutional patches that aggregate information from multiple video frames into single tokens, reducing computational overhead
Strong multilingual support across dozens of languages
Competitive performance on benchmarks while being openly available
The model can process long videos, PDFs, and screenshots efficiently, making it valuable for document AI and multimedia analysis.
OpenVLA
Stanford researchers introduced OpenVLA in June 2024 as the first major open-source Vision-Language-Action model for robotics. Key specifications:
7 billion parameters
Trained on Open X-Embodiment dataset (over 1 million robot episodes across 22 different robotic platforms)
16.5% absolute improvement over closed models like RT-2-X (55B parameters) despite being 7x smaller
Fine-tunable on consumer GPUs via LoRA, with serving efficiency via quantization
OpenVLA demonstrated that high-quality robotic control could be achieved with open models, democratizing robotics research. The model outputs discrete action tokens that can be executed directly on physical robots.
Gemma and Gemma 2
Google's open-source Gemma family, particularly Gemma 2, offers strong OCR and multilingual capabilities. These lightweight models (ranging from 2B to 27B parameters) are designed for deployment in resource-constrained environments while maintaining impressive performance on document analysis, medical imaging, and content moderation tasks.
Real-World Applications and Case Studies
Vision Language Models aren't just laboratory curiosities—they're solving real problems across industries.
Healthcare and Medical Diagnostics
Case Study 1: Retinal Disease Detection
Researchers from multiple institutions, including the Technical University of Munich and Medical University of Vienna, published research in 2025 demonstrating specialized VLM training for retinal OCT (Optical Coherence Tomography) image analysis.
The team developed custom-trained VLMs specifically for Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) classification. Their key findings:
General-purpose VLMs like GPT-4o struggled with subtle clinical distinctions between AMD stages, often missing critical biomarkers like hypertransmission or drusenoid pigment epithelial detachments
Specialized curriculum-trained VLMs achieved clinical-grade performance by learning from structured expert knowledge rather than generic internet data
The specialized models could identify specific disease biomarkers that foundation models missed entirely
The research, published in PMC and detailed in their paper, emphasized that becoming a clinical specialist requires years of training. Current foundation VLMs, despite their breadth, lack the nuanced domain knowledge for specialized medical tasks without additional fine-tuning on expert-curated datasets.
Applications Across Medical Imaging
According to OpenCV's comprehensive 2025 analysis, VLMs are revolutionizing multiple areas of medical imaging:
Emergency Triage: VLMs analyze X-rays and CT scans in emergency departments, automatically flagging critical findings like brain bleeds or pneumothorax for immediate physician attention, potentially saving precious minutes in life-threatening situations.
Automated Report Generation: Radiologists face overwhelming workloads. VLMs can draft preliminary reports from medical images, which radiologists then review and finalize. A chest X-ray showing bilateral pulmonary infiltrates might automatically generate: "Bilateral airspace opacities predominantly in the lower lobes, concerning for pneumonia. Consider clinical correlation and follow-up imaging."
Interactive Diagnostics: Rather than static reports, VLMs enable conversational interaction with medical images. A clinician can ask, "Is there evidence of an ACL tear?" and receive "Yes, a high-grade tear is visible at the femoral insertion point," then follow up with "Compare to the scan from six months ago," receiving a detailed comparison of disease progression.
Real-Time Surgical Assistance: During surgeries, VLMs analyze live video from endoscopic cameras, providing augmented reality overlays highlighting critical structures like nerves to avoid or tumor margins to ensure complete removal.
A November 2024 review published in Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence examined 16 recent medical VLMs and 18 public medical vision-language datasets, documenting rapid progress while noting persistent challenges around data privacy, limited dataset availability, and need for better evaluation metrics.
Autonomous Vehicles and Robotics
Case Study 2: Vision-Language-Action Models for Humanoid Robots
Figure AI's Helix, unveiled in February 2025, represents a breakthrough in humanoid robotics. This VLA (Vision-Language-Action) model controls the entire upper body of a humanoid robot—arms, hands, torso, head, and fingers—at high frequency.
Technical architecture:
Dual-system design: System 2 (S2) handles scene understanding and language comprehension using an internet-scale VLM. System 1 (S1) translates S2's latent representations into continuous robot actions
Trained on ~500 hours of robot teleoperation paired with automatically generated text descriptions
Can fold origami and manipulate cards, demonstrating fine motor control previously impossible with conventional robotic systems
NVIDIA's GR00T N1, released in March 2025, adopted similar dual-system architecture for humanoid robots, incorporating heterogeneous training data comprising robot trajectories, human videos, and synthetic datasets.
Case Study 3: Autonomous Driving with VLMs
According to a comprehensive survey on Vision Language Models in Autonomous Driving (arXiv, June 2024), VLMs are transforming self-driving systems across four key areas:
Perception and Understanding: VLMs don't just detect objects—they understand context. A traditional computer vision system might identify a school bus. A VLM understands that a school bus stopped with flashing lights means children might cross the road, requiring extra caution.
Navigation and Planning: Natural language interfaces allow human operators to give high-level instructions like "Take me to the airport via the scenic route, avoiding highways," which the VLM translates into actionable navigation plans considering traffic, road conditions, and route preferences.
Decision-Making and Control: VLMs enable explainable autonomous driving. When the vehicle makes a decision—like slowing down before an unmarked intersection—it can explain "I'm reducing speed because the building on the right blocks visibility of cross-traffic."
End-to-End Driving: Systems like DriveVLM and DriveLMM integrate vision-language models directly into the driving pipeline, processing camera feeds, reading road signs, understanding traffic signals, and generating control commands—all while maintaining conversational ability to explain its actions to passengers.
The survey, co-authored by researchers from multiple institutions, notes that incorporating language data helps driving systems gain better understanding of real-world environments, thereby enhancing driving safety and efficiency.
Retail and E-Commerce
Automated Product Tagging and Catalog Management
Retailers managing thousands of products face a daunting cataloging task. VLMs automatically:
Generate accurate product descriptions from images
Extract attributes (color, style, size, material) without manual tagging
Create SEO-optimized content for e-commerce platforms
Identify products in user-generated content for social commerce
A fashion retailer might upload a photo of a dress, and the VLM outputs: "Flowing maxi dress in coral pink, featuring a v-neck, three-quarter length sleeves with lace detail, and a belted waist. Ideal for summer events or beach weddings." This description is then automatically formatted for the website, saving hours of manual work per product.
Visual Search and Recommendations
Customers can upload photos to find similar products. A user might photograph a lamp they saw in a restaurant, and the VLM identifies "Mid-century modern brass table lamp with linen shade," then retrieves similar items from the retailer's inventory.
Content Moderation and Safety
Case Study 4: Multimodal Safety Models
Google's ShieldGemma 2, introduced in early 2025, represents the first open multimodal safety model. According to Hugging Face's 2025 VLM update, this model:
Takes images and content policies as input
Returns whether an image is safe for a given policy
Can filter outputs of image generation models
Operates transparently with open weights, allowing organizations to audit and customize safety criteria
Meta's Llama Guard 4, also released in 2025, is a dense multimodal and multilingual safety model. It can evaluate text-only or multimodal content, filter VLM outputs, and examine complete conversation histories before sending content to users—critical for platforms serving billions of users across cultures.
These safety VLMs address a growing need: as generative AI produces images and videos, automated content moderation must keep pace without requiring human reviewers to constantly examine potentially harmful content.
Accessibility and Assistive Technologies
VLMs are transforming accessibility for people with visual impairments:
Scene Description: A blind person can point their smartphone camera at a scene and receive detailed descriptions: "You're in a grocery store aisle. On your left are breakfast cereals, approximately 15 shelves high. On your right are granola bars and snack foods. There's a price-check scanner on the pole ahead at roughly 10 o'clock, about 3 meters away."
Reading Assistance: VLMs can read handwritten notes, printed signs, medicine labels, and documents aloud, providing independence for tasks that previously required sighted assistance.
Navigation Guidance: Combined with GPS and smartphone cameras, VLMs offer turn-by-turn navigation with visual context: "Cross the street at the pedestrian crossing ahead. The walk signal is currently green. Two people are crossing from the opposite direction."
VLMs vs Traditional AI Models
Understanding how VLMs differ from traditional approaches clarifies their revolutionary nature.
Traditional Computer Vision Models
How They Work: Classic computer vision models like ResNet, VGG, or YOLO are trained on labeled image datasets. Engineers compile thousands or millions of images, each tagged with specific categories: "dog," "cat," "car," "stop sign."
The model learns to map visual patterns to these predefined categories through supervised learning. It becomes highly accurate at recognizing what it was explicitly trained on.
Limitations:
Fixed Vocabulary: If not trained on "giraffe," it can't recognize giraffes. Adding new categories requires retraining with new labeled data.
No Language Understanding: These models output class IDs or bounding boxes, not natural language. They can detect a dog but can't describe "a golden retriever playing fetch in a sunny park."
No Context Awareness: A traditional model might detect "snow" and "mountain" but won't understand "a dangerous avalanche forming" or "ideal skiing conditions."
Labor-Intensive Data Requirements: Creating ImageNet took years of human annotation work for 14 million images across 1,000 categories.
Traditional Large Language Models (LLMs)
How They Work: Models like GPT-3 or BERT excel at understanding and generating text. They've read vast swaths of the internet, learning patterns in language, facts, reasoning capabilities, and writing styles.
Limitations:
Blind to Images: No matter how eloquently GPT-3 can write about dogs, it can't look at a photo and tell you if there's a dog present.
No Visual Grounding: An LLM might describe a "red sports car" beautifully, but it has no concrete understanding of what "red" or "sports car" actually looks like visually.
Cannot Verify Visual Claims: If someone says "this is a photo of the Eiffel Tower" but uploads a picture of Big Ben, a pure LLM has no way to verify the claim.
Vision Language Models: The Best of Both Worlds
VLMs combine strengths while addressing limitations:
Capability | Traditional CV | Traditional LLM | VLM |
Recognize objects in images | ✓ (limited) | ✗ | ✓ |
Describe images in natural language | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
Answer questions about images | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
Zero-shot recognition of new categories | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
Read and understand text in images | Limited | ✗ | ✓ |
Multi-step reasoning about visual content | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
Spatial reasoning and relationships | Limited | ✗ | ✓ |
Generate text from visual input | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
Understand visual context | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
Example Comparison:
Imagine analyzing a photo of a busy restaurant kitchen:
Traditional CV Model: "Person, person, person, oven, knife, cutting board, pot, pan" (object labels)
Traditional LLM: Cannot process the image at all
VLM: "A professional kitchen during dinner service. Three chefs in white uniforms are actively cooking. The chef on the left is sautéing vegetables in a large pan over a gas flame. In the center, another chef is plating a dish with precision, suggesting fine dining. On the right, the expeditor is checking completed orders. The kitchen appears well-organized despite the busy environment, with proper commercial equipment and adherence to professional kitchen standards."
Pros and Cons of Vision Language Models
Advantages
1. Versatility Across Domains
VLMs are generalists by design. A single model can:
Analyze medical X-rays
Navigate autonomous vehicles
Moderate social media content
Assist with e-commerce product descriptions
Help visually impaired users navigate spaces
Traditional models required separate specialized systems for each application.
2. Zero-Shot and Few-Shot Learning
Perhaps the most powerful advantage: VLMs can handle tasks they've never explicitly been trained for. Describe a new object in words, and the VLM can recognize it in images. This dramatically reduces the need for expensive dataset creation and model retraining.
A traditional model trained only on "German Shepherd" and "Poodle" has no concept of "Labrador." A VLM, understanding the textual description "Labrador: a large, friendly retriever breed with short yellow or black fur," can identify Labradors despite never seeing one during training.
3. Natural Language Interaction
Users interact with VLMs conversationally, without needing technical expertise. Instead of configuring complex APIs or learning specialized interfaces, anyone can upload an image and ask questions in plain English.
4. Multimodal Reasoning
VLMs connect visual and textual information in ways that unlock new capabilities. They can:
Read a chart and explain trends
Compare images across time ("Has the tumor grown since last month's scan?")
Combine visual evidence with textual knowledge ("This plant shows signs of iron deficiency, commonly seen in alkaline soils")
5. Improved Explainability
Traditional "black box" computer vision models make predictions without explanation. VLMs can articulate their reasoning: "I identified this as a malignant melanoma because of the asymmetric shape, irregular borders, and color variation—characteristics defined in the ABCDE criteria for melanoma detection."
Disadvantages
1. Computational Requirements
VLMs are resource-intensive:
Training Costs: CLIP's largest model trained for 12 days on 256 V100 GPUs. At cloud computing rates, this exceeds $100,000 in compute costs. Larger models require exponentially more resources.
Inference Costs: Running VLMs in production is expensive. Processing images requires more computation than text-only models. The AI vision market was valued at $15.85 billion in 2024 and projected to reach $108.99 billion by 2033 (Grand View Research, 2025), reflecting both opportunity and infrastructure costs.
Memory Requirements: Large VLMs may require multiple high-end GPUs for deployment, limiting accessibility for small organizations.
2. Hallucinations and Accuracy Issues
VLMs sometimes generate plausible-sounding but incorrect information:
Describing objects that aren't present in an image
Misidentifying critical details in high-stakes applications like medical diagnostics
Overconfident assertions without acknowledging uncertainty
A 2025 arXiv survey noted hallucination as one of the primary challenges facing current VLMs, alongside concerns about factuality and reliability in safety-critical applications.
3. Data Scarcity for Specialized Domains
While internet-scale data works well for common objects and scenes, specialized domains face data limitations:
Medical imaging: Most clinical data is private due to HIPAA and similar regulations
Industrial inspection: Manufacturers don't publish defect images
Rare phenomena: Few training examples exist for uncommon scenarios
The retinal disease research (2025) demonstrated that even GPT-4o, trained on massive general datasets, struggled with specialized medical tasks without domain-specific training.
4. Bias and Fairness Concerns
VLMs learn from internet data, inheriting societal biases:
Racial and gender stereotypes in image descriptions
Cultural biases in interpreting scenes
Socioeconomic assumptions based on visual cues
A VLM trained predominantly on Western imagery might misinterpret cultural practices or clothing from other regions.
5. Privacy and Security Risks
Processing images through VLM APIs raises privacy concerns:
Medical images contain highly sensitive patient information
Personal photos reveal private details about individuals and locations
Proprietary business images might contain trade secrets
Organizations must carefully evaluate data handling practices when using cloud-based VLMs.
6. Limited Temporal Understanding
While progress has been made, VLMs still struggle with complex video understanding:
Long-term temporal dependencies (understanding plot developments in movies)
Subtle motion patterns (detecting gait abnormalities in medical assessments)
Causal reasoning about events unfolding over time
7. Lack of True Physical Understanding
VLMs learn statistical patterns from images but don't develop genuine physical intuition about the 3D world:
They might not understand object permanence (that objects continue existing when occluded)
Gravity and physics principles are often weakly represented
Spatial reasoning in three dimensions remains challenging
Myths vs Facts About VLMs
Myth 1: VLMs "See" Like Humans Do
Fact: VLMs process pixels mathematically, extracting patterns and matching them to learned representations. They don't experience vision phenomenologically. A VLM analyzing a sunset calculates statistical distributions of color values and matches them to textual descriptions of "sunset"—it doesn't experience the beauty or emotional resonance humans feel.
Myth 2: VLMs Are Always More Accurate Than Humans
Fact: VLMs excel at certain tasks (rapid analysis of thousands of images, detecting subtle statistical patterns) but fail at others where humans remain superior (understanding rare contexts, common-sense reasoning in novel situations, ethical judgment). The retinal imaging study showed specialized training is essential for clinical-grade performance.
Myth 3: Bigger Models Are Always Better
Fact: Model size correlates with capability, but architecture, training data quality, and fine-tuning matter enormously. OpenVLA (7B parameters) outperformed RT-2-X (55B parameters) in robotic manipulation tasks by 16.5% absolute improvement. SmolVLA with just 450 million parameters achieves comparable performance to much larger VLAs on specific tasks.
Myth 4: VLMs Will Replace Human Experts
Fact: VLMs augment human expertise rather than replace it. In medical diagnostics, VLMs draft preliminary reports that radiologists review. In autonomous vehicles, VLMs assist human drivers or operate under human supervision in geofenced areas. For complex judgment requiring ethical reasoning, contextual knowledge, and accountability, humans remain essential.
Myth 5: Open-Source VLMs Are Far Behind Proprietary Models
Fact: While proprietary models like GPT-4V and Gemini lead on some benchmarks, open-source models are competitive and sometimes superior on specific tasks. LLaVA demonstrates strong performance on language grounding. Qwen2.5-VL excels at video processing. OpenVLA leads in robotics. The gap is narrowing rapidly.
Myth 6: VLMs Understand Meaning the Way Humans Do
Fact: VLMs are sophisticated pattern matchers that learned statistical associations between visual features and linguistic tokens. Whether they possess "understanding" in a deeper sense remains philosophically debated. They can perform tasks requiring apparent understanding without necessarily having conscious comprehension.
Common Challenges and Limitations
Data Availability and Quality
Imbalanced Datasets: Internet-scraped datasets over-represent common objects, Western cultures, and privileged perspectives. Rare objects, minority cultures, and specialized domains are underrepresented, leading to poor VLM performance on these categories.
Noisy Labels: Web data contains errors. Captions may be irrelevant, incorrect, or misleading. A photo tagged "beach vacation" might actually show a lake. These errors propagate into model training, degrading quality.
Multimodal Misalignment: Sometimes images and captions don't match semantically. A news article about a political scandal might include a stock photo of the capitol building, but the caption and image aren't directly related. VLMs must learn to handle such misalignments.
Evaluation Difficulties
Lack of Standardized Benchmarks: Unlike computer vision (ImageNet) or NLP (GLUE, SuperGLUE) which have established benchmarks, VLM evaluation is fragmented. Different models are tested on different tasks, making direct comparisons difficult.
MMMU (Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning), introduced as a comprehensive benchmark, contains 11.5K challenges across college-level subjects. MMBench offers 3,000 single-choice questions across 20 skills. Open VLM Leaderboard ranks models, but benchmarks evolve constantly, as noted in Hugging Face's VLM evaluation documentation.
Subjective Quality Assessment: How do you objectively measure if an image description is "good"? Two accurate descriptions might differ in detail level, style, or emphasis. Human judgment is required, but is expensive and inconsistent.
Computational and Environmental Costs
Training large VLMs consumes enormous energy. CLIP's largest model required 256 GPUs for 12 days—equivalent to thousands of kilowatt-hours of electricity. As models scale further, environmental concerns grow.
The AI industry is investing in more efficient architectures:
Mixture-of-Experts (MoE): Activating only relevant subnetworks rather than the entire model for each input
Quantization: Reducing numerical precision without significant accuracy loss
Efficient Attention Mechanisms: Approximating full attention to reduce quadratic complexity
Domain Adaptation Challenges
General-purpose VLMs trained on internet data often fail on specialized tasks without fine-tuning:
Medical Imaging: Models trained on consumer photos struggle with specialized modalities (MRI, CT, ultrasound, pathology slides) that have different visual characteristics and require domain expertise.
Industrial Inspection: Detecting subtle manufacturing defects requires understanding normal vs. abnormal variations in very specific contexts (e.g., scratches on polished metal surfaces).
Scientific Imagery: Microscopy, satellite imagery, astronomical images, and scientific visualizations have unique properties that general VLMs may not handle well.
Solution: Domain-specific fine-tuning on curated expert datasets, though this reintroduces the data scarcity problem.
Ethical and Societal Concerns
Bias Amplification: VLMs can amplify harmful stereotypes present in training data. If internet images disproportionately show doctors as men and nurses as women, the VLM may generate biased descriptions or captions.
Deepfakes and Misinformation: VLMs that understand images can be combined with image generation models to create sophisticated fake content—altering photos in contextually coherent ways that are difficult to detect.
Privacy Violations: VLMs might infer sensitive information from images. A photo of someone's bookshelf or refrigerator contents could reveal personal details users don't intend to share.
Dual Use: VLMs developed for beneficial applications (medical diagnosis, accessibility) can be misused for surveillance, military applications, or manipulation.
Temporal and Causal Reasoning Limitations
VLMs struggle with:
Video Understanding: While improving, processing hours of video with full temporal comprehension remains challenging
Cause-and-Effect: Inferring causal relationships from visual evidence is difficult. Does the broken glass cause the wet floor, or did the wet floor cause someone to drop the glass?
Counterfactual Reasoning: "What would happen if this object were removed?" requires understanding beyond visible data
Benchmarks and Evaluation Metrics
Key Benchmarks for VLMs
MMMU (Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark)
Introduced as the most comprehensive VLM evaluation, MMMU contains:
11.5K multimodal challenges
College-level subject knowledge requirements
Disciplines spanning arts, engineering, sciences, and more
Tests deep reasoning, not just pattern matching
MMBench
Focuses on breadth of skills:
3,000 single-choice questions
20 different capabilities including OCR, object localization, spatial reasoning, and more
Allows fine-grained comparison of model strengths and weaknesses
SWE-bench Verified
Tests software engineering capabilities:
Real-world GitHub issues
Models must understand code, documentation, and visual elements (UIs, diagrams)
Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads at 70.3%, followed by Gemini 2.5 Pro at 63.8%
VQAv2 (Visual Question Answering)
Classic benchmark with:
Open-ended questions about images
Tests compositional understanding ("How many red objects are on the table?")
Requires spatial reasoning and attribute recognition
COCO Captions
Evaluates image captioning quality:
330K images with 5 human-written captions each
Metrics like BLEU, METEOR, CIDEr measure caption quality against human references
Tests descriptive accuracy and language naturalness
Open VLM Leaderboard
Maintained by Hugging Face, ranks VLMs across multiple metrics:
Average scores across benchmarks
Filterable by model size and license (proprietary vs. open-source)
Community-driven with regular updates
Powered by VLMEvalKit toolkit
Evaluation Challenges
No Single Perfect Metric: Different applications prioritize different qualities. Medical imaging demands precision; creative captioning values descriptiveness. A single score cannot capture all relevant dimensions.
Benchmark Contamination: As models train on increasingly large internet datasets, they may inadvertently train on benchmark data, inflating scores artificially.
Distribution Shift: Benchmarks often use curated datasets that don't reflect real-world data distributions. A model performing well on clean benchmark images may fail on blurry smartphone photos or unusual lighting conditions.
Future Outlook: What's Next for VLMs
Trends Shaping the Next Generation
1. Extended Context and Long-Form Understanding
Gemini's 1 million token context (soon 2 million) sets a new standard. Future VLMs will process:
Hours of video footage in a single query
Entire document archives with embedded images
Years of medical imaging history for individual patients
This enables applications previously impossible: analyzing a patient's complete imaging history to detect subtle disease progression, or reviewing a company's entire video surveillance archive to investigate an incident.
2. Edge Deployment and On-Device VLMs
Models are shrinking while maintaining capability:
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: Fast, cost-efficient variant for mobile deployment
SmolVLA: 450M parameters running locally
Quantization and Pruning: Techniques reducing model size by 4-8x without major accuracy loss
Benefits include:
Privacy (data never leaves the device)
Reduced latency (no network round-trips)
Offline functionality
Cost savings (no cloud inference fees)
3. Multimodal Agents and Embodied AI
VLMs are evolving from passive analyzers to active agents:
Software Agents: VLMs controlling computers, navigating interfaces, filling forms, and executing multi-step tasks autonomously. Hugging Face's smolagents library exemplifies this direction.
Physical Robots: VLAs like Helix, GR00T N1, and Gemini Robotics demonstrate VLMs controlling complex physical systems. Future humanoid robots may achieve human-level dexterity and adaptability.
Autonomous Vehicles: Deeper VLM integration into self-driving systems, enabling true natural language instruction-following and sophisticated scene understanding.
4. Improved Safety and Alignment
As VLMs become more capable, ensuring they're beneficial and safe becomes critical:
Specialized Safety Models: Like ShieldGemma 2 and Llama Guard 4, dedicated to content moderation and safety filtering.
Interpretability Research: Understanding why VLMs make specific decisions, enabling debugging and preventing harmful outcomes.
Robustness Testing: Adversarial testing to find failure modes before deployment in safety-critical applications.
Federated Learning: Training VLMs on distributed data without centralizing sensitive information, addressing privacy concerns while enabling learning from confidential datasets like medical records.
5. Specialized Domain Models
While general-purpose VLMs advance, specialized models will proliferate:
Medical VLMs: Like LLaVA-Med and specialized retinal imaging models, trained on expert-curated medical datasets with clinical validation.
Scientific VLMs: Understanding microscopy, satellite imagery, astronomical data, and scientific visualizations.
Industrial VLMs: Tailored for manufacturing quality control, infrastructure inspection, and specialized industrial applications.
Legal and Financial VLMs: Processing documents with complex visual elements (contracts with diagrams, financial statements with charts).
Market Projections
The global artificial intelligence market, including VLMs, shows explosive growth:
2024 Market Size: $638.23 billion (Precedence Research, 2025)
2025 Projection: $757.58 billion
2034 Forecast: $3,680.47 billion
CAGR: 19.20% (2025-2034)
The AI vision market specifically:
2024: $15.85 billion
2033 Projection: $108.99 billion
CAGR: 24.1% (Grand View Research, 2025)
Investment continues accelerating. In June 2025, LuminX AI secured $5.5 million in seed funding for warehouse automation using VLM technology. Major tech companies (Microsoft, Google, Meta) increased AI capital expenditures from $139 billion in 2024 to $215 billion in 2025, primarily for infrastructure supporting models like VLMs.
Potential Breakthroughs on the Horizon
Self-Supervised Learning Advances: Reducing reliance on paired image-text data through better unsupervised and self-supervised techniques.
Causal Reasoning: VLMs that understand not just correlation but causation in visual data, enabling more sophisticated inference.
True 3D Understanding: Moving beyond 2D images to genuine 3D scene comprehension, understanding object geometry, occlusion, and spatial relationships in three dimensions.
Cross-Lingual and Cross-Cultural Generalization: VLMs that understand visual concepts consistently across languages and cultures, reducing Western bias.
Hybrid Neuro-Symbolic Systems: Combining neural VLMs with symbolic reasoning engines for tasks requiring logical deduction and structured knowledge.
How to Get Started with VLMs
For Researchers and Developers
1. Experiment with Existing Models
Start with pre-trained models:
OpenAI GPT-4V: Available via ChatGPT Plus or API. Upload images and ask questions. Python example:
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI()
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="gpt-4-vision-preview",
messages=[{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{"type": "text", "text": "What's in this image?"},
{"type": "image_url", "image_url": {"url": "https://example.com/image.jpg"}}
]
}]
)Google Gemini: Via Google AI Studio or Vertex AI. Supports text, images, video, and audio.
Anthropic Claude: Through the API or Claude.ai interface. Excellent for document analysis with images.
2. Use Open-Source Models
Hugging Face Transformers: Provides easy access to models like CLIP, LLaVA, and more:
from transformers import CLIPProcessor, CLIPModel
from PIL import Image
model = CLIPModel.from_pretrained("openai/clip-vit-base-patch32")
processor = CLIPProcessor.from_pretrained("openai/clip-vit-base-patch32")
image = Image.open("photo.jpg")
text_inputs = ["a dog", "a cat", "a car"]
inputs = processor(text=text_inputs, images=image, return_tensors="pt", padding=True)
outputs = model(**inputs)
logits_per_image = outputs.logits_per_image
probs = logits_per_image.softmax(dim=1)LLaVA: Available on GitHub with detailed instructions for fine-tuning on custom datasets.
3. Fine-Tune for Your Domain
Start with a pre-trained model and fine-tune on domain-specific data:
Use LoRA (Low-Rank Adaptation): Dramatically reduces fine-tuning costs by updating only a small subset of parameters. Can train on consumer GPUs.
Curate Quality Data: Even a few hundred high-quality examples can significantly improve performance on specialized tasks.
Leverage Existing Datasets: For medical imaging, explore datasets like ChestX-ray14, MIMIC-CXR, or RadImageNet. For robotics, Open X-Embodiment provides extensive trajectory data.
4. Evaluation and Iteration
Benchmark on Standard Datasets: Use MMBench, VQAv2, or domain-specific benchmarks to measure performance.
Human Evaluation: For subjective tasks (captioning, description quality), human ratings remain essential.
Error Analysis: Manually review failure cases to identify systematic weaknesses.
For Business and Non-Technical Users
1. Identify Use Cases
Where could VLMs add value in your organization?
Automating image-heavy workflows
Enhancing customer support with visual troubleshooting
Quality control and inspection
Accessibility improvements
Document processing with embedded images
2. Start with Commercial APIs
Major providers offer user-friendly APIs:
OpenAI: GPT-4V via API, with pay-as-you-go pricing Google: Gemini through Google Cloud, integrates with Workspace Anthropic: Claude API with strong safety features
3. Pilot Projects
Begin with small-scale pilots:
Limited scope (one department, one use case)
Clear success metrics
Risk mitigation (human review of outputs)
Cost monitoring
4. Address Privacy and Compliance
Before deploying:
Review data policies: Where does data go? How long is it retained?
GDPR/HIPAA compliance: For EU/medical data, ensure compliance
Consider on-premise options: For highly sensitive data, deploy models internally
5. Training and Change Management
Successful VLM adoption requires:
Training staff on capabilities and limitations
Setting appropriate expectations (VLMs augment, not replace, human judgment)
Establishing review processes for VLM outputs
Creating feedback loops to improve performance
FAQ
Q1: Can VLMs create images, or only understand them?
Most VLMs only analyze images, not generate them. Models like GPT-4V, Gemini, and Claude take images as input and produce text output (descriptions, answers, analysis). However, some systems combine VLMs with image generation models (like DALL-E or Stable Diffusion) to enable both understanding and creation. CLIP, for instance, is used within Stable Diffusion to guide image generation based on text prompts.
Q2: How accurate are VLMs compared to human experts?
It depends enormously on the domain. On some benchmark tasks (identifying common objects in clean images), VLMs approach or exceed human accuracy. However, for specialized domains requiring expertise—medical diagnostics, legal document analysis, nuanced cultural interpretation—humans remain superior without specialized VLM fine-tuning. The 2025 retinal imaging research showed that even GPT-4o struggled with clinical-grade medical image analysis without domain-specific training. VLMs are best viewed as powerful assistive tools rather than replacements for human expertise.
Q3: Do I need expensive GPUs to use VLMs?
For using pre-trained VLMs via API (OpenAI, Google, Anthropic), you need only a computer with internet access—processing happens in the cloud. For running open-source VLMs locally, requirements vary. Smaller models (few billion parameters) can run on consumer GPUs or even CPUs for inference, though slowly. Fine-tuning or training from scratch requires more powerful hardware, though techniques like LoRA make fine-tuning accessible on single consumer GPUs.
Q4: Can VLMs handle videos, or just static images?
Modern VLMs increasingly support video. Gemini 2.5 Pro processes video natively with its million-token context window. Models like Qwen2.5-VL use specialized architectures (3D convolutional patches) for efficient video understanding. However, video capabilities remain less mature than image understanding. Processing hours of video with full temporal comprehension is still challenging and computationally expensive.
Q5: Are VLMs' image descriptions biased?
Yes, VLMs reflect biases present in their training data. Models trained predominantly on internet images from Western countries may misinterpret or misrepresent scenes from other cultures. Gender, racial, and socioeconomic biases can appear in generated descriptions. Researchers are actively working on debiasing techniques, but addressing bias comprehensively remains an ongoing challenge. Users should be aware of these limitations, especially in sensitive applications.
Q6: Can VLMs understand emotions or abstract concepts in images?
VLMs can learn to associate visual patterns with emotional or abstract concepts described in their training data. They can identify "a person who looks sad" or "a chaotic scene," but whether they truly understand emotions the way humans do is philosophically debated. They recognize patterns associated with these concepts rather than experiencing them. For abstract art interpretation, VLMs often produce plausible-sounding descriptions based on learned associations, but may miss nuanced artistic intent that requires deep cultural or historical context.
Q7: How do VLMs handle multiple images in one query?
Capabilities vary by model. Some VLMs process only one image per query. Others, particularly those with large context windows like Gemini 2.5 Pro, can handle multiple images, comparing and contrasting them or answering questions that require information from several images. For example, asking "How has the patient's condition changed across these four X-rays from different dates?" requires processing all images together.
Q8: What languages do VLMs support?
Major VLMs like GPT-4V, Gemini, and Claude support dozens of languages for text input/output. However, language quality varies—English typically performs best due to more training data. Image understanding capability is often similar across languages (since visual features don't change), but textual nuances, cultural context, and language-specific visual elements (non-Latin scripts in images) may pose challenges. Models like Gemma and Qwen emphasize multilingual support explicitly.
Q9: Can VLMs be fine-tuned on my own data?
Yes, though feasibility depends on the model. Open-source models like LLaVA, Qwen, and others explicitly support fine-tuning. Using techniques like LoRA, you can fine-tune on hundreds to thousands of custom image-text pairs using consumer hardware. Proprietary models (GPT-4V, Gemini, Claude) generally don't offer user fine-tuning of the base model itself, but some provide fine-tuning of API behaviors or support custom prompting strategies. For specialized domains, fine-tuning open-source models is often the most effective approach.
Q10: Are VLMs safe for sensitive data like medical images or proprietary documents?
Using cloud-based VLMs for sensitive data requires careful consideration. Review each provider's data policies:
OpenAI: API data may be used to improve models unless you opt out
Google: Varies by service tier; enterprise Vertex AI offers stronger privacy guarantees
Anthropic: Committed to not training on user data
For highly sensitive applications, consider:
Self-hosted open-source models
On-premise deployment
Anonymizing data before processing
Using models fine-tuned specifically for your domain rather than general-purpose APIs
Q11: How long does it take to train a VLM?
Training from scratch requires massive resources. CLIP's largest model took 12 days on 256 V100 GPUs—equivalent to months on a single GPU. However, most users never train from scratch. Instead, they:
Use pre-trained models directly (zero-shot)
Fine-tune existing models (hours to days on consumer GPUs with LoRA)
Prompt engineer without any training
Fine-tuning for a specific application typically requires days to weeks, including data preparation, training runs, and evaluation.
Q12: Will VLMs replace traditional computer vision models?
Unlikely to fully replace, but increasingly supplementing them. Traditional models remain:
More efficient for narrow, well-defined tasks
Faster for real-time applications requiring minimal latency
Easier to validate and verify for safety-critical systems
Less resource-intensive
VLMs excel when flexibility, generalization, and language interaction matter. Many systems combine both: traditional CV for fast object detection, VLMs for higher-level understanding and reasoning.
Q13: What file formats and image sizes can VLMs handle?
Most VLMs accept common formats (JPEG, PNG, WebP, GIF). Some support PDFs with embedded images. Image size limits vary:
API-based models: Often have file size limits (e.g., 20MB) and resolution limits
Open-source models: Depends on hardware and configuration
Very high-resolution images may be downscaled automatically. For detailed analysis (medical images, satellite imagery), check whether the model preserves sufficient resolution or use specialized high-resolution VLMs.
Q14: Can VLMs detect AI-generated or manipulated images?
VLMs can be trained for this task, but it's not a default capability of most general-purpose models. Specialized models for detecting deepfakes, manipulations, or AI-generated content exist, but general VLMs like GPT-4V or Gemini aren't specifically optimized for this. As both generation and detection technologies advance, this remains an arms race. Don't rely on general VLMs for forensic image authenticity verification without specific validation.
Q15: How often are VLMs updated, and do they learn from user interactions?
Commercial VLMs are updated periodically (months to years between major versions). They don't learn continuously from individual user interactions. Your conversation doesn't train the model. However, aggregated, anonymized data may be used for future training (depending on provider policies and your settings). This means VLMs don't remember your past conversations unless within a single session, and corrections you make don't immediately improve the model for everyone.
Key Takeaways
Vision Language Models bridge computer vision and natural language processing, enabling AI to understand both images and text—a transformative capability unlocking applications from healthcare to autonomous vehicles
Core architecture combines vision encoders (ViT or CNN), language models (transformer-based), and fusion layers that connect visual and linguistic representations in shared embedding spaces
CLIP's 2021 release revolutionized the field by demonstrating that contrastive learning on 400 million internet image-text pairs enables zero-shot transfer to downstream tasks without explicit training
Major 2025 models include GPT-4V (versatile all-rounder), Gemini 2.5 Pro (multimodal with 1M+ token context), and Claude Sonnet 4.5 (leading in reasoning), alongside powerful open-source alternatives like LLaVA and Qwen2.5-VL
Real-world applications span healthcare (automated diagnostics, report generation), robotics (humanoid control, autonomous manipulation), retail (product tagging), and accessibility (scene description for blind users)
VLMs excel at zero-shot learning, recognizing objects they've never explicitly seen by understanding textual descriptions, dramatically reducing need for expensive labeled datasets
Significant challenges remain: computational costs, hallucinations, domain adaptation requirements, bias and fairness concerns, and limited understanding of causality and 3D spatial relationships
The AI market is growing explosively from $638.23 billion (2024) to a projected $3,680.47 billion by 2034, with VLMs as a major growth driver (Precedence Research, 2025)
Specialized training is essential for expert-level performance in domains like medical diagnostics, where general-purpose models struggle despite broad knowledge (retinal imaging study, 2025)
Future directions include edge deployment (on-device VLMs), multimodal agents (software and robotic control), extended context windows (processing hours of video), and improved safety and alignment mechanisms
Actionable Next Steps
For Researchers and AI Engineers:
Experiment with CLIP and LLaVA through Hugging Face Transformers to understand VLM fundamentals firsthand
Explore the Open VLM Leaderboard to identify state-of-the-art models for your specific application domain
Fine-tune an open-source VLM on a small custom dataset using LoRA to experience the domain adaptation process with minimal resources
Contribute to VLM benchmarking by testing models on your domain-specific tasks and sharing results with the research community
Stay current with arXiv papers on VLM architectures, training methods, and applications in your field of interest
For Product Managers and Business Leaders:
Identify three high-value workflows in your organization involving images, documents, or videos where VLMs could add value (automation, quality improvement, new capabilities)
Run a pilot project using commercial APIs (GPT-4V, Gemini, or Claude) on one use case, with clear success metrics and human review processes
Assess data privacy requirements and determine whether cloud APIs suffice or on-premise deployment is necessary for sensitive data
Calculate ROI potential by estimating time saved per task, error reduction, and new capabilities enabled by VLM adoption
Develop an AI governance framework addressing ethics, bias mitigation, transparency, and accountability before scaling VLM use
For Individual Learners:
Try ChatGPT Plus or a similar interface allowing image uploads, experimenting with diverse queries to understand capabilities and limitations
Take online courses covering computer vision fundamentals, NLP basics, and multimodal learning (Coursera, fast.ai, Hugging Face courses)
Read seminal papers: CLIP (Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision), LLaVA (Visual Instruction Tuning), and recent VLM surveys
Join communities like Hugging Face forums, r/MachineLearning, or AI Discord servers to engage with practitioners and stay updated
Build a simple project: Create a photo organization tool, accessibility app, or content moderation prototype using VLM APIs to gain practical experience
Glossary
Contrastive Learning: A training technique where models learn by comparing data points, pulling similar examples together in embedding space while pushing dissimilar ones apart. CLIP uses contrastive learning to match images with their textual descriptions.
Embedding: A numerical representation (vector) of data. VLMs convert images and text into embeddings—lists of numbers that capture semantic meaning. Similar concepts have similar embeddings.
Fine-Tuning: Adapting a pre-trained model to a specific task or domain by training it further on specialized data. Often requires far less data and computation than training from scratch.
Foundation Model: A large-scale model trained on broad data that serves as a base for multiple downstream applications. GPT-4, CLIP, and Gemini are foundation models.
Hallucination: When AI generates plausible-sounding but incorrect information. VLMs might describe objects not present in an image or make confident assertions about uncertain details.
LORA (Low-Rank Adaptation): An efficient fine-tuning method that updates only a small subset of model parameters, enabling training on consumer hardware while preserving most of the model's knowledge.
Multimodal: Processing multiple types of data (text, images, audio, video) within a single model. VLMs are multimodal because they handle both visual and linguistic information.
OCR (Optical Character Recognition): Technology that reads text from images. Modern VLMs incorporate OCR capabilities, understanding not just that text is present but what it means contextually.
Prompt Engineering: Crafting input queries to elicit desired outputs from AI models. Effective prompting significantly impacts VLM performance.
Transformer: A neural network architecture using self-attention mechanisms to process sequential data. Transformers underpin modern LLMs and VLMs, handling both language and vision.
Vision Transformer (ViT): A transformer architecture adapted for images by dividing pictures into patches treated as sequences, analogous to words in sentences.
VQA (Visual Question Answering): Task where models answer natural language questions about images ("How many cats are in this photo?"). A key capability of VLMs.
Zero-Shot Learning: Model capability to perform tasks it wasn't explicitly trained for, using its general knowledge. VLMs can recognize objects they've never seen by understanding textual descriptions.
Sources and References
Anthropic. (2024). Introducing Claude 3 Models. Retrieved from Anthropic blog.
DataCamp. (2025, July 28). Top 10 Vision Language Models in 2025. Retrieved from https://www.datacamp.com/blog/top-vision-language-models
Dextralabs. (2025, September 10). Top 10 Vision Language Models in 2025: Benchmark, Use Cases. Retrieved from https://dextralabs.com/blog/top-10-vision-language-models/
Exploding Topics. (2025). Global Artificial Intelligence Market Report. Cited in Dextralabs analysis.
Figure AI. (2025, February). Helix: Vision-Language-Action Model for Humanoid Robots. Product announcement.
Fello AI. (2025, May 30). We Tested Claude 4, GPT-4.5, Gemini 2.5 Pro & Grok 3. Retrieved from https://felloai.com/2025/05/we-tested-claude-4-gpt-4-5-gemini-2-5-pro-grok-3-whats-the-best-ai-to-use-in-may-2025/
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. (2024, November 19). Vision-language models for medical report generation and visual question answering: a review. PubMed PMID: 39628839. Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39628839/
Grand View Research. (2025). AI Vision Market Size, Share & Trends | Industry Report, 2033. Retrieved from https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/ai-vision-market-report
Grand View Research. (2025). Artificial Intelligence Market Size | Industry Report, 2033. Retrieved from https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/artificial-intelligence-ai-market
Hugging Face. (2024, April). Vision Language Models Explained. Blog post. Retrieved from https://huggingface.co/blog/vlms
Hugging Face. (2025, January). Vision Language Models (Better, faster, stronger). Blog update. Retrieved from https://huggingface.co/blog/vlms-2025
IBM. (2025, February 25). What Are Vision Language Models (VLMs)? IBM Think Topics. Retrieved from https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/vision-language-models
Kawaharazuka, K., Oh, J., Yamada, J., Posner, I., & Zhu, Y. (2025). Vision-Language-Action Models for Robotics: A Review Towards Real-World Applications. IEEE Access, 13, 162467-162504. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3609980
NVIDIA. (2025). What are Vision-Language Models? NVIDIA Technical Documentation. Retrieved from https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/glossary/vision-language-models/
NVIDIA. (2025, March). GR00T N1: Vision-Language-Action Model for Humanoid Robots. Product release.
OpenAI. (2021, February 26). CLIP: Connecting text and images. OpenAI Research. Retrieved from https://openai.com/research/clip
OpenCV. (2025, August 8). Vision Language Models in Healthcare. OpenCV Blog. Retrieved from https://opencv.org/blog/vlm-in-healthcare/
PMC (PubMed Central). (2025). Specialized curricula for training vision language models in retinal image analysis. Article ID: PMC12365215. Retrieved from https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12365215/
Precedence Research. (2025, February 11). Artificial Intelligence Market Size to Hit USD 3,680.47 Bn by 2034. Press release. Retrieved from https://www.precedenceresearch.com/artificial-intelligence-market
Precedence Research. (2025, June 19). Artificial Intelligence (AI) Market Size Worth USD 3,680.47 Bn By 2034. Market report.
Radford, A., Kim, J. W., Hallacy, C., Ramesh, A., Goh, G., Agarwal, S., ... & Sutskever, I. (2021). Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision. arXiv:2103.00020. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.00020
Shadow Blog. (2025). Best AI Model in 2025: Claude 3.7 vs Gemini 2.5 vs GPT-4o. Retrieved from https://www.shadow.do/blog/best-ai-model-in-2025-claude-3-7-vs-gemini-2-5-vs-gpt-4o
Wikipedia. (2025, September 4). Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contrastive_Language-Image_Pre-training
Wikipedia. (2025, September). Vision-language-action model. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vision-language-action_model
Xia, P. et al. (2025). Vision Language Models in Medicine. arXiv:2503.01863. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.01863
Zhou, X. et al. (2024, June 20). Vision Language Models in Autonomous Driving: A Survey and Outlook. arXiv:2310.14414v2. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.14414
Zhou, X. et al. (2025). Vision-Language-Action Models: Concepts, Progress, Applications and Challenges. arXiv:2505.04769. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/html/2505.04769v1
$50
Product Title
Product Details goes here with the simple product description and more information can be seen by clicking the see more button. Product Details goes here with the simple product description and more information can be seen by clicking the see more button
$50
Product Title
Product Details goes here with the simple product description and more information can be seen by clicking the see more button. Product Details goes here with the simple product description and more information can be seen by clicking the see more button.
$50
Product Title
Product Details goes here with the simple product description and more information can be seen by clicking the see more button. Product Details goes here with the simple product description and more information can be seen by clicking the see more button.
Comments